Malek Shatila, Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Jay Shah, Andres Urias Rivera, Sidra Naz, Stephen Glombicki, Sharada Wali, Eric Lu, Nicholas Short, Anusha Thomas, Hao Chi Zhang, Yinghong Wang
{"title":"Checkpoint Inhibition Prior to Stem Cell Transplantation Increases the Risk of Inflammatory Adverse Events.","authors":"Malek Shatila, Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Jay Shah, Andres Urias Rivera, Sidra Naz, Stephen Glombicki, Sharada Wali, Eric Lu, Nicholas Short, Anusha Thomas, Hao Chi Zhang, Yinghong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11523-025-01127-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stem cell transplantation (SCT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are both used in the treatment of hematological malignancies. There may be an overlap in patient exposure to both treatments. Theoretically, ICIs potentiate the graft-versus-tumor effect following SCT but may increase the risk of inflammatory adverse events (AEs). Conversely, immunosuppression following SCT may decrease the risk of immune-mediated AEs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to explore the effect of immunotherapy on the risk and severity of inflammatory AEs following SCT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review that included all patients with a hematological malignancy treated with immunotherapy and who received SCT. Patients who did not receive immunosuppressive regimens after their transplant (e.g., autologous transplants) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on ICI timing: pre-SCT ICI (group 1) and post-SCT ICI (group 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 patients were included. Around 82% of patients in group 1 experienced a post-transplant AE compared with 50% in group 2 (p = 0.014). These AEs occurred earlier in group 1 patients (median 57 days in group 1 versus 195 in group 2; p = 0.007). Roughly 80% of the inflammatory conditions involved the gastrointestinal system. Severity and complication rates did not differ between groups, but gastrointestinal inflammation in group 1 was more likely to require immunosuppressive medication (75.7% and 37.8% requiring corticosteroids and selective immunosuppressive therapy, respectively, in group 1 patients versus 33.3% and 0% in group 2 patients; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our knowledge, our study is one of few exploring the impact of ICI timing in relation to SCT on the risk of post-SCT inflammatory AEs. Administration of immunotherapy prior to SCT may predispose patients to inflammatory AEs after SCT, which may occur earlier and last longer than if ICIs are started after SCT. Future studies are needed to further explore this phenomenon.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-025-01127-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Stem cell transplantation (SCT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are both used in the treatment of hematological malignancies. There may be an overlap in patient exposure to both treatments. Theoretically, ICIs potentiate the graft-versus-tumor effect following SCT but may increase the risk of inflammatory adverse events (AEs). Conversely, immunosuppression following SCT may decrease the risk of immune-mediated AEs.
Objectives: We aimed to explore the effect of immunotherapy on the risk and severity of inflammatory AEs following SCT.
Patients and methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review that included all patients with a hematological malignancy treated with immunotherapy and who received SCT. Patients who did not receive immunosuppressive regimens after their transplant (e.g., autologous transplants) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on ICI timing: pre-SCT ICI (group 1) and post-SCT ICI (group 2).
Results: A total of 63 patients were included. Around 82% of patients in group 1 experienced a post-transplant AE compared with 50% in group 2 (p = 0.014). These AEs occurred earlier in group 1 patients (median 57 days in group 1 versus 195 in group 2; p = 0.007). Roughly 80% of the inflammatory conditions involved the gastrointestinal system. Severity and complication rates did not differ between groups, but gastrointestinal inflammation in group 1 was more likely to require immunosuppressive medication (75.7% and 37.8% requiring corticosteroids and selective immunosuppressive therapy, respectively, in group 1 patients versus 33.3% and 0% in group 2 patients; p < 0.05).
Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study is one of few exploring the impact of ICI timing in relation to SCT on the risk of post-SCT inflammatory AEs. Administration of immunotherapy prior to SCT may predispose patients to inflammatory AEs after SCT, which may occur earlier and last longer than if ICIs are started after SCT. Future studies are needed to further explore this phenomenon.
期刊介绍:
Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes:
Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches.
Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways.
Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective.
Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations.
Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement.
Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.