The Perspectives and Experiences of Older LGBTI+ Adults About Long-Term Care: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Sarah McMullen-Roach, Saravana Kumar, Maria Inacio, Carolyn Murray
{"title":"The Perspectives and Experiences of Older LGBTI+ Adults About Long-Term Care: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.","authors":"Sarah McMullen-Roach, Saravana Kumar, Maria Inacio, Carolyn Murray","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>LGBTI+ older adults have experienced historical and systemic discrimination. Such discrimination has led to health inequities and avoidance of services. As LGBTI+ people age, they may need to access services, but information about this experience is situated in small-scale qualitative studies. As such this meta-synthesis aimed to bring together the perspectives and experiences of LGBTI+ older adults in literature about engagement with long-term care services.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A meta-synthesis with a meta-ethnographic approach was conducted with qualitative published and gray literature. Findings were then confirmed through community consultation conducted with LGBTI+ adults aged 50.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 qualitative studies were included in the meta-synthesis. LGBTI+ older adults' perspectives and experiences were synthesized into 4 key themes: (1) We see it as being heterosexualized, (2) With no one there to guard us, (3) You have to hide 90% of yourself, and (4) I don't want a different service, I want a good service.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Overarching heterosexism, experiences of discrimination, and complexities in maintaining identity all contributed to a predominately negative experience for LGBTI+ adults when engaging with long-term care. These experiences were found to align with \"minority stress\" theory. Our review found that a multilevel approach that included staff education, LGBTI+ affirmative care, and signs and symbols of inclusivity was required to reduce the impact of minority stress experienced by LGBTI+ older adults and to increase their engagement in long-term care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12187521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: LGBTI+ older adults have experienced historical and systemic discrimination. Such discrimination has led to health inequities and avoidance of services. As LGBTI+ people age, they may need to access services, but information about this experience is situated in small-scale qualitative studies. As such this meta-synthesis aimed to bring together the perspectives and experiences of LGBTI+ older adults in literature about engagement with long-term care services.

Research design and methods: A meta-synthesis with a meta-ethnographic approach was conducted with qualitative published and gray literature. Findings were then confirmed through community consultation conducted with LGBTI+ adults aged 50.

Results: A total of 55 qualitative studies were included in the meta-synthesis. LGBTI+ older adults' perspectives and experiences were synthesized into 4 key themes: (1) We see it as being heterosexualized, (2) With no one there to guard us, (3) You have to hide 90% of yourself, and (4) I don't want a different service, I want a good service.

Discussion and implications: Overarching heterosexism, experiences of discrimination, and complexities in maintaining identity all contributed to a predominately negative experience for LGBTI+ adults when engaging with long-term care. These experiences were found to align with "minority stress" theory. Our review found that a multilevel approach that included staff education, LGBTI+ affirmative care, and signs and symbols of inclusivity was required to reduce the impact of minority stress experienced by LGBTI+ older adults and to increase their engagement in long-term care services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

LGBTI+老年人对长期护理的看法和经验:一项定性的系统回顾和综合。
背景与目的:LGBTI+老年人经历了历史性和系统性的歧视。这种歧视导致保健不公平和逃避服务。随着LGBTI+人群年龄的增长,他们可能需要获得服务,但关于这种经历的信息位于小规模的定性研究中。因此,荟萃综合旨在将LGBTI+老年人参与长期护理服务的观点和经验汇集在一起。研究设计和方法:采用元民族志方法对已发表的定性文献和灰色文献进行meta综合。然后,通过对50岁的LGBTI+成年人进行社区咨询,证实了研究结果。结果:meta综合共纳入55项定性研究。LGBTI+老年人的观点和经历被综合成4个关键主题:1)我们认为这是异性恋,2)没有人保护我们,3)你必须隐藏自己的90%,4)我不想要不同的服务,我想要一个好的服务。讨论和启示:异性恋、歧视经历和维持身份的复杂性都是LGBTI+成年人在接受长期护理时的主要负面体验。这些经历被发现与“少数民族压力”理论相一致。我们的回顾发现,需要一个多层次的方法,包括员工教育,LGBTI+积极关怀和包容性的标志和符号,以减少LGBTI+老年人经历的少数民族压力的影响,并增加他们对长期护理服务的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信