Tiny drivers, big decisions: parental perceptions and experiences of power mobility device trials for young children with cerebral palsy.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Lisa K Kenyon, Bethany M Sloane, Lauren N Beers, Katelyn J Chung, Jessica Doty, Amberlyn R Erlenbeck, Madeline Herrenkohl, Samuel W Logan, Heather A Feldner
{"title":"Tiny drivers, big decisions: parental perceptions and experiences of power mobility device trials for young children with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Lisa K Kenyon, Bethany M Sloane, Lauren N Beers, Katelyn J Chung, Jessica Doty, Amberlyn R Erlenbeck, Madeline Herrenkohl, Samuel W Logan, Heather A Feldner","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2459884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore parental perceptions and experiences at three timepoints [baseline (T0), post-intervention period 1 (T1), and post-intervention period 2 (T2)] across a 16-week study involving their children's use of two power mobility (PM) devices: an Explorer Mini (EM) and a modified ride-on car (mROC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data for this phenomenological qualitative study were gathered as part of a multi-site randomized, counterbalanced AB crossover clinical trial, wherein all child participants used PM device A (EM) and PM device B (mROC) for eight weeks each. Trained researchers conducted in-person, audio-recorded semi-structured parental interviews at T0, T1, and T2. Data from each timepoint were individually analysed using the constant comparative method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four child-parent participant dyads partook in the larger clinical trial. The parent participant within each dyad completed three qualitative interviews (one per timepoint), resulting in a total of 72 interviews (24 at each timepoint). At each timepoint, unique themes representing the parent participants' journey across the study emerged. Main themes were: T0 - \"Anticipation\", \"Adjustment\", and \"Recognizing Strengths\"; T1 - \"Benefits and Barriers\", \"Expectations\", and \"Importance of Device Trials\"; T2 - \"One Size Doesn't Fit All, But All Are Worth Trying\", \"Environmental Affordances Enable Learning\", and \"Enabling Abilities and Participation\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides insights into how parental perceptions about power mobility may shift over time, thereby assisting clinicians in implementing ON Time Mobility. The study further highlights how PM use can positively impact socialization and participation and how PM use may provide children with a mobile learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2459884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore parental perceptions and experiences at three timepoints [baseline (T0), post-intervention period 1 (T1), and post-intervention period 2 (T2)] across a 16-week study involving their children's use of two power mobility (PM) devices: an Explorer Mini (EM) and a modified ride-on car (mROC).

Materials and methods: Data for this phenomenological qualitative study were gathered as part of a multi-site randomized, counterbalanced AB crossover clinical trial, wherein all child participants used PM device A (EM) and PM device B (mROC) for eight weeks each. Trained researchers conducted in-person, audio-recorded semi-structured parental interviews at T0, T1, and T2. Data from each timepoint were individually analysed using the constant comparative method.

Results: Twenty-four child-parent participant dyads partook in the larger clinical trial. The parent participant within each dyad completed three qualitative interviews (one per timepoint), resulting in a total of 72 interviews (24 at each timepoint). At each timepoint, unique themes representing the parent participants' journey across the study emerged. Main themes were: T0 - "Anticipation", "Adjustment", and "Recognizing Strengths"; T1 - "Benefits and Barriers", "Expectations", and "Importance of Device Trials"; T2 - "One Size Doesn't Fit All, But All Are Worth Trying", "Environmental Affordances Enable Learning", and "Enabling Abilities and Participation".

Conclusion: This study provides insights into how parental perceptions about power mobility may shift over time, thereby assisting clinicians in implementing ON Time Mobility. The study further highlights how PM use can positively impact socialization and participation and how PM use may provide children with a mobile learning environment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信