Blood Glucose Range for Hyperglycemic PICU Children With Primary Neurologic Diagnoses: Analysis of the Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration Trial.
Kerri L LaRovere, Lisa A Asaro, Kerry Coughlin-Wells, Vinay M Nadkarni, Michael S D Agus
{"title":"Blood Glucose Range for Hyperglycemic PICU Children With Primary Neurologic Diagnoses: Analysis of the Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration Trial.","authors":"Kerri L LaRovere, Lisa A Asaro, Kerry Coughlin-Wells, Vinay M Nadkarni, Michael S D Agus","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare two blood glucose (BG) ranges in critically ill children with and without primary neurologic diagnoses in the Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration trial (HALF-PINT; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01565941).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Non-prespecified post hoc analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirty-one PICUs in the United States, and one in Canada.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Non-diabetic children enrolled from April 2012 to September 2016 with cardiovascular or respiratory failure and hyperglycemia. Patients in the neurologic subgroup had primary neurologic diagnoses on ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to insulin infusion to target lower-BG (80-110 mg/dL; 4.4-6.1 mmol/L) or higher-BG (150-180 mg/dL; 8.3-10 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Primary diagnosis (neurologic vs. non-neurologic), daily BG and insulin values, outcomes (number of PICU-free days through day 28 and 1-y post-PICU discharge adaptive behavior composite score of Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition). Of 698 patients analyzed, 64 (30 lower-BG target, 34 higher-BG target) had primary neurologic diagnoses and 634 (319 lower-BG target, 315 higher-BG target) had non-neurologic diagnoses. Within the neurologic subgroup, patients in the lower-BG targeting group had fewer ICU-free days compared with those in the higher-BG targeting group (median 8.5 vs. 21.1 d), whereas there was no difference between BG groups in the non-neurologic subgroup (20.5 vs. 19.3 d; interaction p = 0.02). One-year adaptive behavior composite score was less favorable for the lower-BG targeting group in those with neurologic diagnoses (mean 63.3 vs. 87.6), but no different in those with non-neurologic diagnoses (81.9 vs. 78.4; interaction p = 0.02). Lower-BG targeting was associated with more hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dL) in both diagnostic subgroups, with no differential effect across subgroups (p = 0.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this non-prespecified analysis of the HALF-PINT trial data, lower-BG targeting in hyperglycemic critically ill children with primary neurologic diagnoses was associated with unfavorable outcomes, while such BG targeting in those with non-neurologic diagnoses was not associated with adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare two blood glucose (BG) ranges in critically ill children with and without primary neurologic diagnoses in the Heart and Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration trial (HALF-PINT; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01565941).
Design: Non-prespecified post hoc analysis.
Setting: Thirty-one PICUs in the United States, and one in Canada.
Patients: Non-diabetic children enrolled from April 2012 to September 2016 with cardiovascular or respiratory failure and hyperglycemia. Patients in the neurologic subgroup had primary neurologic diagnoses on ICU admission.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to insulin infusion to target lower-BG (80-110 mg/dL; 4.4-6.1 mmol/L) or higher-BG (150-180 mg/dL; 8.3-10 mmol/L).
Measurements and main results: Primary diagnosis (neurologic vs. non-neurologic), daily BG and insulin values, outcomes (number of PICU-free days through day 28 and 1-y post-PICU discharge adaptive behavior composite score of Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition). Of 698 patients analyzed, 64 (30 lower-BG target, 34 higher-BG target) had primary neurologic diagnoses and 634 (319 lower-BG target, 315 higher-BG target) had non-neurologic diagnoses. Within the neurologic subgroup, patients in the lower-BG targeting group had fewer ICU-free days compared with those in the higher-BG targeting group (median 8.5 vs. 21.1 d), whereas there was no difference between BG groups in the non-neurologic subgroup (20.5 vs. 19.3 d; interaction p = 0.02). One-year adaptive behavior composite score was less favorable for the lower-BG targeting group in those with neurologic diagnoses (mean 63.3 vs. 87.6), but no different in those with non-neurologic diagnoses (81.9 vs. 78.4; interaction p = 0.02). Lower-BG targeting was associated with more hypoglycemia (< 60 mg/dL) in both diagnostic subgroups, with no differential effect across subgroups (p = 0.47).
Conclusions: In this non-prespecified analysis of the HALF-PINT trial data, lower-BG targeting in hyperglycemic critically ill children with primary neurologic diagnoses was associated with unfavorable outcomes, while such BG targeting in those with non-neurologic diagnoses was not associated with adverse outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.