Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach is effective in reducing postoperative opioids requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Alessandro DE Cassai, Burhan Dost, Dario Bugada, Yunus E Karapinar, Müzeyyen Beldagli, Mirac S Ozkal Yalin, Ali Ahiskalioglu, Serkan Tulgar
{"title":"Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach is effective in reducing postoperative opioids requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Alessandro DE Cassai, Burhan Dost, Dario Bugada, Yunus E Karapinar, Müzeyyen Beldagli, Mirac S Ozkal Yalin, Ali Ahiskalioglu, Serkan Tulgar","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18490-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) has been proposed as an effective regional anesthesia technique for reducing postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis to assess the analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA block in LC.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We searched Pubmed Central, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to until 1 July 2024). The effects of the M-TAPA were compared with those of sham block, placebo and no intervention. Randomized controlled trials, observational and retrospective studies were included. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption at 24 hours, while secondary outcomes included pain scores at 12 and 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and rescue analgesic requirements.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>This meta-analysis included six studies encompassing four randomized controlled trials, one retrospective study, and one prospective observational study, with a total of 350 patients. The analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption (MD -9.06; 95% CI -11.6 to -6.48, P=0.001) in the M-TAPA group. Additionally, patients receiving M-TAPA reported lower pain scores at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. The risk of PONV was significantly reduced (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.39, P=0.001), and fewer patients required rescue analgesics (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.65, P=0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>M-TAPA block provides superior analgesia when compared with control group in LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18490-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) has been proposed as an effective regional anesthesia technique for reducing postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis to assess the analgesic efficacy of M-TAPA block in LC.

Evidence acquisition: We searched Pubmed Central, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to until 1 July 2024). The effects of the M-TAPA were compared with those of sham block, placebo and no intervention. Randomized controlled trials, observational and retrospective studies were included. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption at 24 hours, while secondary outcomes included pain scores at 12 and 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and rescue analgesic requirements.

Evidence synthesis: This meta-analysis included six studies encompassing four randomized controlled trials, one retrospective study, and one prospective observational study, with a total of 350 patients. The analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption (MD -9.06; 95% CI -11.6 to -6.48, P=0.001) in the M-TAPA group. Additionally, patients receiving M-TAPA reported lower pain scores at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. The risk of PONV was significantly reduced (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.39, P=0.001), and fewer patients required rescue analgesics (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.65, P=0.05).

Conclusions: M-TAPA block provides superior analgesia when compared with control group in LC.

经软骨周围入路改良胸腹神经阻滞可有效减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后阿片类药物需求:一项试验序列分析的荟萃分析。
导论:改良胸腹神经阻滞经软膜外入路(M-TAPA)已被提出作为一种有效的区域麻醉技术,用于减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者术后阿片类药物的消耗。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,采用试验序贯分析来评估M-TAPA阻滞在LC中的镇痛效果。证据获取:我们检索了Pubmed Central、Scopus和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(从成立到2024年7月1日)。将M-TAPA与假阻断、安慰剂和不干预的效果进行比较。包括随机对照试验、观察性研究和回顾性研究。主要结局是术后24小时的阿片类药物消耗,次要结局包括12和24小时的疼痛评分、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)以及救援镇痛需求。证据综合:本荟萃分析包括6项研究,包括4项随机对照试验、1项回顾性研究和1项前瞻性观察研究,共纳入350例患者。分析表明,术后阿片类药物消耗显著减少(MD -9.06;95% CI为-11.6 ~ -6.48,P=0.001)。此外,接受M-TAPA治疗的患者在术后12和24小时的疼痛评分较低。PONV的风险显著降低(OR 0.19;95% CI 0.10 ~ 0.39, P=0.001),需要急救镇痛药的患者较少(OR 0.24;95% CI 0.09 ~ 0.65, P=0.05)。结论:与对照组相比,M-TAPA阻滞在LC中具有更好的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信