Significance of tibial-tubercle trochlear groove distance and adjunctive radiological parameters in patients with recurrent patellar instability.

Q1 Medicine
W Lim, O Al-Dadah
{"title":"Significance of tibial-tubercle trochlear groove distance and adjunctive radiological parameters in patients with recurrent patellar instability.","authors":"W Lim, O Al-Dadah","doi":"10.1007/s12306-025-00884-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to evaluate patients with patellar dislocations to facilitate diagnosis and management strategies. Many radiological parameters have been described in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess the significance of tibial-tubercle trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) distance and other MRI measurements in patients with and without patellar instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control study included 41 patients with recurrent patellar instability and 50 patients with stable knees, all of whom underwent MRI scans. A total of 19 radiological parameters were measured in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All measured MRI parameters had statistically significant differences between both groups (p < 0.05) apart from trochlear cartilage length. TT-TG distance. 20 mm had the strongest association with patellar instability (OR 53.3, p = 0.006, 95%CI [3.1- 927.4]) and the highest specificity (100%) but had the lowest sensitivity (34%) out of all the measured parameters. TT-TG. 13 mm had a higher sensitivity (68%) but lower specificity (72%) and weaker association with patellar instability (OR 5.5, p < 0.001, 95%CI [2.2. 13.7]). TT-TG/trochlear articular cartilage width ratio also had a strong association with patellar instability (OR 14.7, p < 0.001, 95%CI [4.5. 48.5]) with high specificity (92%) but lower sensitivity (56%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cut-off values for TT-TG distance at 13 mm and 20 mm both had advantages and disadvantages which supports the concept of using patient-individualised ratios. Patellar instability is associated with many radiological abnormalities demonstrated on MRI scans. Selection of the most appropriate measurement is dependent on the philosophy and preference of the treating clinician.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-025-00884-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to evaluate patients with patellar dislocations to facilitate diagnosis and management strategies. Many radiological parameters have been described in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess the significance of tibial-tubercle trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) distance and other MRI measurements in patients with and without patellar instability.

Methods: This case-control study included 41 patients with recurrent patellar instability and 50 patients with stable knees, all of whom underwent MRI scans. A total of 19 radiological parameters were measured in both groups.

Results: All measured MRI parameters had statistically significant differences between both groups (p < 0.05) apart from trochlear cartilage length. TT-TG distance. 20 mm had the strongest association with patellar instability (OR 53.3, p = 0.006, 95%CI [3.1- 927.4]) and the highest specificity (100%) but had the lowest sensitivity (34%) out of all the measured parameters. TT-TG. 13 mm had a higher sensitivity (68%) but lower specificity (72%) and weaker association with patellar instability (OR 5.5, p < 0.001, 95%CI [2.2. 13.7]). TT-TG/trochlear articular cartilage width ratio also had a strong association with patellar instability (OR 14.7, p < 0.001, 95%CI [4.5. 48.5]) with high specificity (92%) but lower sensitivity (56%).

Conclusion: The cut-off values for TT-TG distance at 13 mm and 20 mm both had advantages and disadvantages which supports the concept of using patient-individualised ratios. Patellar instability is associated with many radiological abnormalities demonstrated on MRI scans. Selection of the most appropriate measurement is dependent on the philosophy and preference of the treating clinician.

胫骨-结节滑车沟距离及辅助影像学参数在复发性髌骨不稳中的意义。
目的:磁共振成像(MRI)常用于评估髌骨脱位患者,以帮助诊断和治疗策略。许多放射学参数已在文献中描述。本研究的目的是评估胫骨-结节滑车沟距离(TT-TG)距离和其他MRI测量在有或无髌骨不稳患者中的意义。方法:本病例对照研究包括41例复发性髌骨不稳患者和50例膝关节稳定患者,所有患者均接受MRI扫描。两组共测量19项放射学参数。结果:两组间所有测量的MRI参数均有统计学差异(p)。结论:TT-TG距离在13 mm和20 mm处的临界值各有优缺点,支持使用患者个体化比率的概念。髌骨不稳定与MRI扫描显示的许多放射学异常有关。选择最合适的测量取决于治疗临床医生的理念和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信