Respiratory and Postoperative Outcomes in Early-onset Scoliosis Patients Treated With Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib: Single-center Experience of 20 Years.

Abstract

Background: This study examines the long-term effectiveness and safety of the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) device, developed in 1989 to treat early-onset scoliosis (EOS) and thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS). Specifically, it assesses VEPTR outcomes over 20 years in a single center, focusing on spine deformity correction, pulmonary function, weight percentile changes, and complication rates.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 patients from the EOS clinic who underwent VEPTR implantation without prior spine surgery, with at least 2 years of follow-up. Data collected included age, sex, weight, height, BMI, weight percentiles, comorbidities, radiographic parameters, pulmonary function tests, and complications. Weight percentile (WP) was calculated as preoperative WP and last follow-up WP. Coronal and sagittal deformities were measured preoperatively, immediately postimplantation, and at the last follow-up. Pulmonary function tests included forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and were correlated with weight percentile changes. Complications were classified using established criteria.

Results: The mean age at VEPTR implantation was 86±34 months, with most cases attributed to neuromuscular scoliosis (56%). The initial coronal Cobb angle improved from 59±18 to 32±14 degrees postimplantation but increased to 60±25 at the final follow-up. Sagittal angles showed similar trends. Pulmonary function tests indicated a decline in FVC and FEV1 over time. There was no correlation between weight percentile changes and pulmonary function changes. Complication rates were high, affecting 63% of patients, which included hardware prominence, device migration, and infections as the most common.

Conclusions: Although VEPTR devices initially corrected spinal deformities, their long-term benefits are limited as the correction becomes less pronounced over time. Expected improvement in pulmonary function is not observed. A different approach to treating EOS and TIS is necessary, as the significant complication rates challenge the implants' effectiveness.

Level of evidence: Level III.