Baseline Liquid Biopsy in Relation to Tissue-Based Parameters in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the Randomized FIRE-4 (AIO-KRK-0114) Study.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-20 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.01174
Sebastian Stintzing, Susanne Klein-Scory, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Martin Fuchs, Florian Kaiser, Kathrin Heinrich, Dominik Paul Modest, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Thomas Decker, Armin Gerger, Stefan Angermeier, Holger Rumpold, Andreas Dickhut, Leopold Öhler, Birgit Gruenberger, Dora Niedersuess-Beke, Matthias Sandmann, Thomas Winder, Joerg Trojan, Gerald Prager, Swantje Held, Jörg Kumbrink, Wolff Schmiegel, Alexander Baraniskin, Volker Heinemann
{"title":"Baseline Liquid Biopsy in Relation to Tissue-Based Parameters in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the Randomized FIRE-4 (AIO-KRK-0114) Study.","authors":"Sebastian Stintzing, Susanne Klein-Scory, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Martin Fuchs, Florian Kaiser, Kathrin Heinrich, Dominik Paul Modest, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Thomas Decker, Armin Gerger, Stefan Angermeier, Holger Rumpold, Andreas Dickhut, Leopold Öhler, Birgit Gruenberger, Dora Niedersuess-Beke, Matthias Sandmann, Thomas Winder, Joerg Trojan, Gerald Prager, Swantje Held, Jörg Kumbrink, Wolff Schmiegel, Alexander Baraniskin, Volker Heinemann","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.01174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The FIRE-4 study randomly assigned patients with first-line <i>RAS</i> wild-type (<i>RAS</i>wt) metastatic colorectal cancer to either flourouracil (FU), folinic acid, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab until progression or intolerable toxicity (standard arm) or to FOLFIRI plus cetuximab followed by a switch maintenance treatment using FU plus bevacizumab (experimental arm). Here, we investigate the relevance of liquid biopsy (LB) RAS and BRAF testing compared with tissue-based analyses.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>LBs were taken at baseline and during treatment and were analyzed for <i>RAS</i> and <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600E</sup> mutations using the in vitro diagnostics-certified ONCOBEAM RAS procedure (Sysmex Inostics) and digital-droplet polymerase chain reaction technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred seventy-two <i>RAS</i>wt patients were randomly assigned. LBs of 540 patients were evaluable at baseline. Of those, 70 (13%) were <i>RAS</i> mutant (<i>RAS</i>mut) and 38 (7%) <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600E</sup> mutant. <i>RAS</i>mut patients had significantly shorter survival compared with <i>RAS</i>wt patients (progression-free survival [PFS], 9.0 months <i>v</i> 11.5 months; <i>P</i> < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; overall survival [OS], 22.1 months <i>v</i> 33.6 months; <i>P</i> < .001; HR, 1.85). <i>RAS</i>mut patients had a numerically greater benefit from early switch maintenance compared with continuation of FOLFIRI/cetuximab (PFS, 10.1 months <i>v</i> 6.4 months; HR, 0.82; OS, 24.9 months <i>v</i> 16.3 months; HR, 0.57). Patients with a <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600E</sup> mutation in LB showed poor outcome (PFS, 5.4 months; OS, 12.0 months). On the basis of serial LB analyses, the conversion rate from <i>RAS</i>wt to <i>RAS</i>mut at disease progression was significantly higher in the arm with continuous cetuximab administration than in the switch maintenance arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LB allows the detection of <i>RAS</i> and <i>BRAF</i> mutations in patients deemed <i>RAS</i>wt on the basis of tissue analyses. These patients show outcome characteristics expected for <i>RAS</i>- and <i>BRAF</i>-mutant patients in tissue. The study thus confirms the high clinical relevance of LB performed at baseline before the start of therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1463-1473"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.01174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The FIRE-4 study randomly assigned patients with first-line RAS wild-type (RASwt) metastatic colorectal cancer to either flourouracil (FU), folinic acid, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab until progression or intolerable toxicity (standard arm) or to FOLFIRI plus cetuximab followed by a switch maintenance treatment using FU plus bevacizumab (experimental arm). Here, we investigate the relevance of liquid biopsy (LB) RAS and BRAF testing compared with tissue-based analyses.

Patients and methods: LBs were taken at baseline and during treatment and were analyzed for RAS and BRAFV600E mutations using the in vitro diagnostics-certified ONCOBEAM RAS procedure (Sysmex Inostics) and digital-droplet polymerase chain reaction technology.

Results: Six hundred seventy-two RASwt patients were randomly assigned. LBs of 540 patients were evaluable at baseline. Of those, 70 (13%) were RAS mutant (RASmut) and 38 (7%) BRAFV600E mutant. RASmut patients had significantly shorter survival compared with RASwt patients (progression-free survival [PFS], 9.0 months v 11.5 months; P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; overall survival [OS], 22.1 months v 33.6 months; P < .001; HR, 1.85). RASmut patients had a numerically greater benefit from early switch maintenance compared with continuation of FOLFIRI/cetuximab (PFS, 10.1 months v 6.4 months; HR, 0.82; OS, 24.9 months v 16.3 months; HR, 0.57). Patients with a BRAFV600E mutation in LB showed poor outcome (PFS, 5.4 months; OS, 12.0 months). On the basis of serial LB analyses, the conversion rate from RASwt to RASmut at disease progression was significantly higher in the arm with continuous cetuximab administration than in the switch maintenance arm.

Conclusion: LB allows the detection of RAS and BRAF mutations in patients deemed RASwt on the basis of tissue analyses. These patients show outcome characteristics expected for RAS- and BRAF-mutant patients in tissue. The study thus confirms the high clinical relevance of LB performed at baseline before the start of therapy.

基线液体活检与转移性结直肠癌组织基础参数的关系:来自随机FIRE-4 (AIO-KRK-0114)研究的结果
目的:fire4研究将一线RAS野生型(RASwt)转移性结直肠癌患者随机分配到氟脲嘧啶(FU),叶酸和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)加西妥昔单抗,直到进展或无法忍受的毒性(标准组),或FOLFIRI加西妥昔单抗,然后使用FU加贝伐单抗切换维持治疗(实验组)。在这里,我们研究了液体活检(LB) RAS和BRAF检测与基于组织的分析的相关性。患者和方法:在基线和治疗期间采集LBs,并使用体外诊断认证的ONCOBEAM RAS程序(Sysmex Inostics)和数字液滴聚合酶链反应技术分析RAS和BRAFV600E突变。结果:672例RASwt患者被随机分配。540例患者的体重在基线时可评估。其中70例(13%)为RAS突变体(RASmut), 38例(7%)为BRAFV600E突变体。与RASwt患者相比,RASmut患者的生存期明显缩短(无进展生存期[PFS], 9.0个月vs 11.5个月;P < .001;风险比[HR], 1.66;总生存期(OS) 22.1个月vs 33.6个月;P < .001;人力资源,1.85)。与继续使用FOLFIRI/西妥昔单抗相比,RASmut患者从早期切换维持中获得的益处更大(PFS, 10.1个月vs 6.4个月;人力资源,0.82;OS: 24.9个月vs 16.3个月;人力资源,0.57)。LB中BRAFV600E突变的患者预后较差(PFS, 5.4个月;OS, 12.0个月)。在连续LB分析的基础上,连续给药西妥昔单抗组的RASwt到RASmut的转换率明显高于切换维持组。结论:在组织分析认为为RASwt的患者中,LB可以检测到RAS和BRAF突变。这些患者在组织中表现出RAS-和braf突变患者所期望的结果特征。因此,该研究证实了在治疗开始前基线进行的LB具有很高的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信