Early Check-In Protocol: Identifying Medication Issues in Patients with Cancer at Health System Specialty Pharmacy.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kayla Ann Phillips, Andrew Wash, Kristin Hutchinson, Katie Jo Cash, Carly Giavatto, Casey Fitzpatrick, Abbey Hunter, Olivia Page, Jessica Mourani, Ana I Lopez-Medina
{"title":"Early Check-In Protocol: Identifying Medication Issues in Patients with Cancer at Health System Specialty Pharmacy.","authors":"Kayla Ann Phillips, Andrew Wash, Kristin Hutchinson, Katie Jo Cash, Carly Giavatto, Casey Fitzpatrick, Abbey Hunter, Olivia Page, Jessica Mourani, Ana I Lopez-Medina","doi":"10.1177/08971900251318574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several studies have illustrated value in early patient contact following oral anticancer medication (OAM) initiation, particularly within the first 14 days of therapy, as adverse effects may lead to early discontinuation or poor adherence. Health-system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) are optimally positioned to adopt this best practice through formalized protocols designed to identify and mitigate medication-related issues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To outline an HSSP-led early check-in protocol for patients taking OAMs and to describe the subsequent interventions conducted by the HSSP team and their acceptance rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HSSPs enacted a protocol in January 2021 requiring oncology pharmacists - to contact patients within 14 days of OAM initiation, aiming to optimize adverse effect management, offer supportive care, address adherence, and provide education. To evaluate the impact of the early check-in protocol, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study across CPS's health system clients from January 2022 to November 2023. HSSP pharmacists created 1698 interventions for 1184 patients from the early check-in. The cancer types most frequently associated with an intervention were breast (n = 431, 25.4%), gastrointestinal (n = 245, 14.4%), and prostate (n = 206, 12.1%). The most frequent intervention categories were adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (n = 1,548, 91.2%) and adherence (n = 55, 3.2%). Overall, 95.5% of pharmacist recommendations were accepted by patients and/or providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing an early check-in protocol allows HSSP pharmacists to mitigate barriers to OAM adherence. This study emphasizes the importance of early check-in and illustrates the scope of the oncology pharmacist's role by evaluating critically meaningful interventions and quantifying pharmacist recommendations and acceptance rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900251318574"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251318574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Several studies have illustrated value in early patient contact following oral anticancer medication (OAM) initiation, particularly within the first 14 days of therapy, as adverse effects may lead to early discontinuation or poor adherence. Health-system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) are optimally positioned to adopt this best practice through formalized protocols designed to identify and mitigate medication-related issues.

Objective: To outline an HSSP-led early check-in protocol for patients taking OAMs and to describe the subsequent interventions conducted by the HSSP team and their acceptance rate.

Results: HSSPs enacted a protocol in January 2021 requiring oncology pharmacists - to contact patients within 14 days of OAM initiation, aiming to optimize adverse effect management, offer supportive care, address adherence, and provide education. To evaluate the impact of the early check-in protocol, we conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study across CPS's health system clients from January 2022 to November 2023. HSSP pharmacists created 1698 interventions for 1184 patients from the early check-in. The cancer types most frequently associated with an intervention were breast (n = 431, 25.4%), gastrointestinal (n = 245, 14.4%), and prostate (n = 206, 12.1%). The most frequent intervention categories were adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (n = 1,548, 91.2%) and adherence (n = 55, 3.2%). Overall, 95.5% of pharmacist recommendations were accepted by patients and/or providers.

Conclusion: Implementing an early check-in protocol allows HSSP pharmacists to mitigate barriers to OAM adherence. This study emphasizes the importance of early check-in and illustrates the scope of the oncology pharmacist's role by evaluating critically meaningful interventions and quantifying pharmacist recommendations and acceptance rate.

早期检查协议:在医疗系统专科药房发现癌症患者的用药问题。
几项研究表明口服抗癌药物(OAM)开始后早期患者接触的价值,特别是在治疗的前14天内,因为不良反应可能导致早期停药或依从性差。卫生系统专业药房(hsps)处于最佳位置,通过旨在识别和减轻药物相关问题的正式协议采用这一最佳做法。目的:概述以HSSP为主导的OAMs患者早期登记方案,并描述HSSP团队随后采取的干预措施及其接受率。结果:HSSPs于2021年1月颁布了一项协议,要求肿瘤药剂师在OAM启动后14天内与患者联系,旨在优化不良反应管理,提供支持性护理,解决依从性问题,并提供教育。为了评估早期登记方案的影响,我们在2022年1月至2023年11月期间对CPS的卫生系统客户进行了一项回顾性、多中心、观察性研究。HSSP药剂师为早期登记的1184名患者创建了1698项干预措施。最常与干预相关的癌症类型是乳腺癌(n = 431, 25.4%)、胃肠道(n = 245, 14.4%)和前列腺癌(n = 206, 12.1%)。最常见的干预类别是药物不良反应(adr) (n = 1548, 91.2%)和依从性(n = 55, 3.2%)。总体而言,95.5%的药剂师建议被患者和/或提供者接受。结论:实施早期登记协议允许HSSP药剂师减轻OAM依从性的障碍。本研究强调早期检查的重要性,并通过评估关键有意义的干预措施和量化药剂师建议和接受率来说明肿瘤药剂师的作用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信