Treatment practices and survival outcomes for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients according to MGMT promoter methylation status: insights from the U.S. National Cancer Database.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
John Pham, David J Cote, Keiko Kang, Robert G Briggs, David Gomez, Apurva Prasad, Sindhu Daggupati, Jonathan Sisti, Frances Chow, Frank Attenello, Clark C Chen, Gabriel Zada
{"title":"Treatment practices and survival outcomes for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients according to MGMT promoter methylation status: insights from the U.S. National Cancer Database.","authors":"John Pham, David J Cote, Keiko Kang, Robert G Briggs, David Gomez, Apurva Prasad, Sindhu Daggupati, Jonathan Sisti, Frances Chow, Frank Attenello, Clark C Chen, Gabriel Zada","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-04952-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Methylation of the O<sup>6</sup>-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is an important prognostic marker in glioblastoma (GBM); however, its implementation in clinical practice remains understudied. Here, we assessed the prevalence of MGMT methylation status among GBM patients in the United States. Additionally, we evaluated treatment practices and survival outcomes of GBM patients according to MGMT promoter methylation status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Cancer Database was queried to identify all adult U.S. patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with IDH-wildtype GBM between 2018 and 2020. Treatment regimen was grouped into no chemotherapy and no radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone (without radiotherapy), radiotherapy alone (without chemotherapy), and chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20,734 patients were included, of whom 6,404 (30.9%) had MGMT-methylated GBM, 9,065 (43.7%) had MGMT-unmethylated tumors, and 5,265 (25.4%) had unknown methylation status. The median and three-year overall survival were 12.4 months and 15.5%, respectively, for the entire cohort (16.4 months and 23.9% for MGMT-methylated patients and 11.8 months and 9.8% for MGMT-unmethylated patients, p < 0.001). Chemoradiotherapy was less commonly used for elderly (≥ 70 years, 58.5%) than non-elderly (< 70 years, 79.2%) patients. Among elderly patients, radiotherapy alone was more commonly administered than chemotherapy alone for patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors (11.2% vs. 2.1%) and MGMT-methylated tumors (6.6% vs. 3.9%). However, chemotherapy alone was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99, p = 0.04) than radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with MGMT-methylated tumors, while chemotherapy alone was associated with a higher mortality risk (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.09-2.44, p = 0.02) than radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. Patients who were elderly, uninsured, insured through Medicaid, lived in zip codes with lower median education levels, or received care at non-academic programs were less likely to undergo MGMT testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high proportion of GBM patients in the United States undergo MGMT promoter testing, though significant sociodemographic disparities exist. While there was a decrease in chemoradiotherapy use with increasing age, radiotherapy alone was more commonly administered to elderly patients than chemotherapy alone irrespective of MGMT promoter methylation status.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04952-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Methylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is an important prognostic marker in glioblastoma (GBM); however, its implementation in clinical practice remains understudied. Here, we assessed the prevalence of MGMT methylation status among GBM patients in the United States. Additionally, we evaluated treatment practices and survival outcomes of GBM patients according to MGMT promoter methylation status.

Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify all adult U.S. patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with IDH-wildtype GBM between 2018 and 2020. Treatment regimen was grouped into no chemotherapy and no radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone (without radiotherapy), radiotherapy alone (without chemotherapy), and chemoradiotherapy (chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling.

Results: A total of 20,734 patients were included, of whom 6,404 (30.9%) had MGMT-methylated GBM, 9,065 (43.7%) had MGMT-unmethylated tumors, and 5,265 (25.4%) had unknown methylation status. The median and three-year overall survival were 12.4 months and 15.5%, respectively, for the entire cohort (16.4 months and 23.9% for MGMT-methylated patients and 11.8 months and 9.8% for MGMT-unmethylated patients, p < 0.001). Chemoradiotherapy was less commonly used for elderly (≥ 70 years, 58.5%) than non-elderly (< 70 years, 79.2%) patients. Among elderly patients, radiotherapy alone was more commonly administered than chemotherapy alone for patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors (11.2% vs. 2.1%) and MGMT-methylated tumors (6.6% vs. 3.9%). However, chemotherapy alone was associated with a lower mortality risk (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99, p = 0.04) than radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with MGMT-methylated tumors, while chemotherapy alone was associated with a higher mortality risk (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.09-2.44, p = 0.02) than radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. Patients who were elderly, uninsured, insured through Medicaid, lived in zip codes with lower median education levels, or received care at non-academic programs were less likely to undergo MGMT testing.

Conclusion: A high proportion of GBM patients in the United States undergo MGMT promoter testing, though significant sociodemographic disparities exist. While there was a decrease in chemoradiotherapy use with increasing age, radiotherapy alone was more commonly administered to elderly patients than chemotherapy alone irrespective of MGMT promoter methylation status.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信