Efficacy of a novel small-caliber therapeutic endoscope in peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders: a propensity score matching analysis.
{"title":"Efficacy of a novel small-caliber therapeutic endoscope in peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders: a propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Hirofumi Abe, Shinwa Tanaka, Hiroya Sakaguchi, Chise Ueda, Masato Kinoshita, Hitomi Hori, Tatsuya Nakai, Tetsuya Yoshizaki, Shinya Hoki, Hiroshi Tanabe, Satoshi Urakami, Takashi Toyonaga, Yuzo Kodama","doi":"10.1007/s10388-025-01107-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>EG-840TP is a novel small-caliber therapeutic endoscope with a large working channel. We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy using EG-840TP compared to those using a conventional therapeutic endoscope (GIF-H290T).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia and non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders were enrolled between March 2021 and March 2023. Procedure times and other treatment outcomes were compared between patients treated with EG-840TP and GIF-H290T using propensity score matching analysis. In the subgroup analysis, patients were divided into subsets based on myotomy length, morphology, esophageal dilation, and operator skill, and the procedure time was compared between the matched groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 patients were enrolled in this study, and 39 patients treated using each type of scope were matched. The EG-840TP group tended to have a shorter procedure time than the GIF-H290T group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of short-term clinical success or perioperative adverse events. In the subgroup analysis, the procedure time of the EG-840TP group was significantly shorter than that of the GIF-H290T group when patients had a straight esophagus (44 min vs. 54 min, p = 0.0015) and the operator was a non-expert (49 min vs. 64 min, p = 0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POEM using EG-840TP showed procedure time, clinical success, and adverse events equivalent to those of a conventional therapeutic endoscope. However, EG-840TP potentially contributed to a shorter procedure time in patients with a straight esophagus or in non-expert operators than GIF-H290T.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-025-01107-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: EG-840TP is a novel small-caliber therapeutic endoscope with a large working channel. We aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy using EG-840TP compared to those using a conventional therapeutic endoscope (GIF-H290T).
Methods: Patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia and non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders were enrolled between March 2021 and March 2023. Procedure times and other treatment outcomes were compared between patients treated with EG-840TP and GIF-H290T using propensity score matching analysis. In the subgroup analysis, patients were divided into subsets based on myotomy length, morphology, esophageal dilation, and operator skill, and the procedure time was compared between the matched groups.
Results: A total of 154 patients were enrolled in this study, and 39 patients treated using each type of scope were matched. The EG-840TP group tended to have a shorter procedure time than the GIF-H290T group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of short-term clinical success or perioperative adverse events. In the subgroup analysis, the procedure time of the EG-840TP group was significantly shorter than that of the GIF-H290T group when patients had a straight esophagus (44 min vs. 54 min, p = 0.0015) and the operator was a non-expert (49 min vs. 64 min, p = 0.031).
Conclusions: POEM using EG-840TP showed procedure time, clinical success, and adverse events equivalent to those of a conventional therapeutic endoscope. However, EG-840TP potentially contributed to a shorter procedure time in patients with a straight esophagus or in non-expert operators than GIF-H290T.
期刊介绍：
Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
