Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Primary Hypercoagulable Disorders.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Henry Avetisian, Will Karakash, Maya Abu-Zahra, Chimere Ezuma, Mirbahador Athari, Marc A Abdou, Dil Patel, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram K Alluri
{"title":"Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Primary Hypercoagulable Disorders.","authors":"Henry Avetisian, Will Karakash, Maya Abu-Zahra, Chimere Ezuma, Mirbahador Athari, Marc A Abdou, Dil Patel, Jeffrey C Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram K Alluri","doi":"10.1177/21925682251316555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in patients with primary hypercoagulable disorders and to compare outcomes between anterior and posterior spine fusions in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PearlDiver national patient database was queried for patients with primary hypercoagulable disorders who underwent ALIF. Primary endpoints included the prevalence of hypercoagulable disorders in patients who underwent ALIF, incidence of perioperative anticoagulation utilization, as well as the 30-day risks of postoperative complications, readmissions, and revision surgeries. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between hypercoagulable patients and non-hypercoagulable patients undergoing ALIF and between hypercoagulable patients undergoing anterior vs posterior lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 211,390 patients who underwent ALIF, 3380 (1.60%) had a hypercoagulable disorder, with only 6.72% receiving perioperative anticoagulation. Within 30 days of ALIF, hypercoagulable disorders were identified as independent risk factors for hospital readmissions and both medical and surgical complications. Compared to posterior spine fusions, the anterior approach poses a greater risk for complications in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with hypercoagulable disorders undergoing ALIF are at increased risk for readmissions and postoperative complications compared to those with normal coagulation profiles. While the posterior approach may be a safer option in this patient population, further research is needed to clarify the safest surgical approach for this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251316555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251316555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: To evaluate the complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in patients with primary hypercoagulable disorders and to compare outcomes between anterior and posterior spine fusions in this patient population.

Methods: The PearlDiver national patient database was queried for patients with primary hypercoagulable disorders who underwent ALIF. Primary endpoints included the prevalence of hypercoagulable disorders in patients who underwent ALIF, incidence of perioperative anticoagulation utilization, as well as the 30-day risks of postoperative complications, readmissions, and revision surgeries. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between hypercoagulable patients and non-hypercoagulable patients undergoing ALIF and between hypercoagulable patients undergoing anterior vs posterior lumbar fusion.

Results: Of the 211,390 patients who underwent ALIF, 3380 (1.60%) had a hypercoagulable disorder, with only 6.72% receiving perioperative anticoagulation. Within 30 days of ALIF, hypercoagulable disorders were identified as independent risk factors for hospital readmissions and both medical and surgical complications. Compared to posterior spine fusions, the anterior approach poses a greater risk for complications in this patient population.

Conclusions: Patients with hypercoagulable disorders undergoing ALIF are at increased risk for readmissions and postoperative complications compared to those with normal coagulation profiles. While the posterior approach may be a safer option in this patient population, further research is needed to clarify the safest surgical approach for this high-risk population.

研究设计回顾性队列研究:评估原发性高凝血症患者接受前路腰椎椎体间融合术(ALIF)的并发症,并比较该患者群体接受前路和后路脊柱融合术的结果:主要终点包括接受 ALIF 的患者中高凝血功能障碍的患病率、围术期使用抗凝药物的发生率以及术后 30 天并发症、再入院和翻修手术的风险。我们进行了多变量回归分析,以比较接受 ALIF 的高凝患者与非高凝患者之间的结果,以及接受前路与后路腰椎融合术的高凝患者之间的结果:在 211,390 名接受 ALIF 的患者中,有 3380 人(1.60%)患有高凝障碍,只有 6.72% 的患者在围手术期接受了抗凝治疗。在 ALIF 术后 30 天内,高凝血症被确定为再入院以及内科和外科并发症的独立风险因素。与后路脊柱融合术相比,前路手术在这一患者群体中引起并发症的风险更大:结论:与凝血功能正常的患者相比,接受ALIF手术的高凝血功能障碍患者再入院和术后并发症的风险更高。虽然后入路可能是这类患者更安全的选择,但仍需进一步研究,以明确这类高风险人群最安全的手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信