Comparative efficacy of cetuximab combined with FOLFOX or CAPEOX in first-line treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter case-control study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anti-Cancer Drugs Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/CAD.0000000000001697
Chang Xu, Jing Ren, Changqing Liu, Yi Gai, Xiangyu Cheng, Yusheng Wang, Guangyu Wang
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of cetuximab combined with FOLFOX or CAPEOX in first-line treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter case-control study.","authors":"Chang Xu, Jing Ren, Changqing Liu, Yi Gai, Xiangyu Cheng, Yusheng Wang, Guangyu Wang","doi":"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>FOLFOX combined with cetuximab is a recommended first-line treatment regimen for RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). CAPEOX combined with cetuximab differs from the FOLFOX regimen by using oral capecitabine instead of continuous infusion of fluorouracil, offering greater convenience and cost-effectiveness with higher patient acceptance. However, the comparative efficacy of these two regimens remains debatable, necessitating further evidence to explore any differences in their efficacy. This study collected medical records of mCRC patients who were treated with CAPEOX or FOLFOX combined with cetuximab from 1 October 2021 to 16 October 2023 at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. Eligible patients were selected based on inclusion criteria and followed up through the hospital's follow-up system and telephone interviews. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to assess patients' progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 71 eligible patients were enrolled in this study; 43 patients received CAPEOX combined with cetuximab (Group A, n  = 43), and 28 patients received FOLFOX combined with cetuximab (Group B, n  = 28). The two groups achieved similar median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS), with mPFS of 18 months and 12 months, respectively ( P  = 0.23), and mOS of 33 months and 20 months, respectively ( P  = 0.21), with no statistically significant differences. The results of this study demonstrated that CAPEOX combined with cetuximab is an equally viable option for first-line treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC as FOLFOX combined with cetuximab.</p>","PeriodicalId":7969,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"383-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

FOLFOX combined with cetuximab is a recommended first-line treatment regimen for RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). CAPEOX combined with cetuximab differs from the FOLFOX regimen by using oral capecitabine instead of continuous infusion of fluorouracil, offering greater convenience and cost-effectiveness with higher patient acceptance. However, the comparative efficacy of these two regimens remains debatable, necessitating further evidence to explore any differences in their efficacy. This study collected medical records of mCRC patients who were treated with CAPEOX or FOLFOX combined with cetuximab from 1 October 2021 to 16 October 2023 at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. Eligible patients were selected based on inclusion criteria and followed up through the hospital's follow-up system and telephone interviews. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to assess patients' progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 71 eligible patients were enrolled in this study; 43 patients received CAPEOX combined with cetuximab (Group A, n  = 43), and 28 patients received FOLFOX combined with cetuximab (Group B, n  = 28). The two groups achieved similar median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS), with mPFS of 18 months and 12 months, respectively ( P  = 0.23), and mOS of 33 months and 20 months, respectively ( P  = 0.21), with no statistically significant differences. The results of this study demonstrated that CAPEOX combined with cetuximab is an equally viable option for first-line treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC as FOLFOX combined with cetuximab.

西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOX或CAPEOX一线治疗RAS/BRAF野生型转移性结直肠癌的比较疗效:一项多中心病例对照研究
FOLFOX联合西妥昔单抗是RAS/BRAF野生型转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的推荐一线治疗方案。CAPEOX联合西妥昔单抗与FOLFOX方案的不同之处是使用口服卡培他滨代替连续输注氟尿嘧啶,提供更大的方便性和成本效益,患者接受度更高。然而,这两种方案的相对疗效仍然存在争议,需要进一步的证据来探索其疗效的任何差异。本研究收集了2021年10月1日至2023年10月16日在哈尔滨医科大学肿瘤医院和山西医科大学第一医院接受CAPEOX或FOLFOX联合西妥昔单抗治疗的mCRC患者的医疗记录。根据纳入标准选择符合条件的患者,并通过医院随访系统和电话访谈进行随访。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险回归分析评估患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。本研究共纳入71例符合条件的患者;CAPEOX联合西妥昔单抗43例(A组,n = 43), FOLFOX联合西妥昔单抗28例(B组,n = 28)。两组患者的中位PFS (mPFS)和中位OS (mOS)相似,mPFS分别为18个月和12个月(P = 0.23), mOS分别为33个月和20个月(P = 0.21),差异无统计学意义。本研究结果表明,CAPEOX联合西妥昔单抗是一线治疗RAS/BRAF野生型mCRC的可行选择,与FOLFOX联合西妥昔单抗同样可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anti-Cancer Drugs
Anti-Cancer Drugs 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anti-Cancer Drugs reports both clinical and experimental results related to anti-cancer drugs, and welcomes contributions on anti-cancer drug design, drug delivery, pharmacology, hormonal and biological modalities and chemotherapy evaluation. An internationally refereed journal devoted to the fast publication of innovative investigations on therapeutic agents against cancer, Anti-Cancer Drugs aims to stimulate and report research on both toxic and non-toxic anti-cancer agents. Consequently, the scope on the journal will cover both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal or biological response modalities such as interleukins and immunotherapy. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信