{"title":"The pursuit of customer centricity","authors":"Joel E. Urbany, Marta Dapena-Baron","doi":"10.1007/s13162-024-00288-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The literature on customer centricity is large and growing, as befits the study of a concept that is arguably at the core of marketing theory and practice. At this point in time, however, there are two troubling aspects of our understanding of customer centricity: (1) There is significant variance in the understanding of the basic concept, illustrated most clearly in (Mier and Jaworski’s Customer Centricity: Definitions, Archetypes, and Future Research 2024) recent discovery of over 50 distinct definitions in the literature, and (2) While evidence shows favorable returns from customer centric initiatives, in practice, many firms struggle to make such initiatives profitable and sustainable. Here, we explore the concept of customer centricity with two senior executives in the medical technology industry. The interviews highlight the complex layers of customer-centric practice in an organization and reinforce the fact that a process of broader organizational change is fundamental to the adoption of any customer-centric operating model. The interviewees provide especially important insight into how an organization in an advanced stage enables customer-centric practice in ways that synergistically enhance its absorptive capacity and widen its view of growth opportunity, as well as the key sources of resistance in earlier stages of adoption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"14 3-4","pages":"298 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-024-00288-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The literature on customer centricity is large and growing, as befits the study of a concept that is arguably at the core of marketing theory and practice. At this point in time, however, there are two troubling aspects of our understanding of customer centricity: (1) There is significant variance in the understanding of the basic concept, illustrated most clearly in (Mier and Jaworski’s Customer Centricity: Definitions, Archetypes, and Future Research 2024) recent discovery of over 50 distinct definitions in the literature, and (2) While evidence shows favorable returns from customer centric initiatives, in practice, many firms struggle to make such initiatives profitable and sustainable. Here, we explore the concept of customer centricity with two senior executives in the medical technology industry. The interviews highlight the complex layers of customer-centric practice in an organization and reinforce the fact that a process of broader organizational change is fundamental to the adoption of any customer-centric operating model. The interviewees provide especially important insight into how an organization in an advanced stage enables customer-centric practice in ways that synergistically enhance its absorptive capacity and widen its view of growth opportunity, as well as the key sources of resistance in earlier stages of adoption.
AMS ReviewBusiness, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍:
The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.