How bumblebees manage conflicting information seen on arrival and departure from flowers

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Marie-Geneviève Guiraud, HaDi MaBouDi, Joe Woodgate, Olivia K. Bates, Oscar Ramos Rodriguez, Vince Gallo, Andrew B. Barron
{"title":"How bumblebees manage conflicting information seen on arrival and departure from flowers","authors":"Marie-Geneviève Guiraud,&nbsp;HaDi MaBouDi,&nbsp;Joe Woodgate,&nbsp;Olivia K. Bates,&nbsp;Oscar Ramos Rodriguez,&nbsp;Vince Gallo,&nbsp;Andrew B. Barron","doi":"10.1007/s10071-024-01926-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bees are flexible and adaptive learners, capable of learning stimuli seen on arrival and at departure from flowers where they have fed. This gives bees the potential to learn all information associated with a feeding event, but it also presents the challenge of managing information that is irrelevant, inconsistent, or conflicting. Here, we examined how presenting bumblebees with conflicting visual information before and after feeding influenced their learning rate and what they learned. Bees were trained to feeder stations mounted in front of a computer monitor. Visual stimuli were displayed behind each feeder station on the monitor. Positively reinforced stimuli (CS +) marked feeders offering sucrose solution. Negatively reinforced stimuli (CS−) marked feeders offering quinine solution. While alighted at the feeder station the stimuli were likely not visible to the bee. The “constant stimulus” training group saw the same stimulus throughout. For the “switched stimulus” training group, the CS + changed to the CS− during feeding. Learning was slower in the “switched stimulus” training group compared to the constant stimulus” group, but the training groups did not differ in their learning performance or the extent to which they generalised their learning. The information conflict in the “switched stimulus” group did not interfere with what had been learned. Differences between the “switched” and “constant stimulus” groups were greater for bees trained on a horizontal CS + than a vertical CS + suggesting bees differ in their processing of vertically and horizontally oriented stimuli. We discuss how bumblebees might resolve this type of information conflict so effectively, drawing on the known neurobiology of their visual learning system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-024-01926-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-024-01926-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bees are flexible and adaptive learners, capable of learning stimuli seen on arrival and at departure from flowers where they have fed. This gives bees the potential to learn all information associated with a feeding event, but it also presents the challenge of managing information that is irrelevant, inconsistent, or conflicting. Here, we examined how presenting bumblebees with conflicting visual information before and after feeding influenced their learning rate and what they learned. Bees were trained to feeder stations mounted in front of a computer monitor. Visual stimuli were displayed behind each feeder station on the monitor. Positively reinforced stimuli (CS +) marked feeders offering sucrose solution. Negatively reinforced stimuli (CS−) marked feeders offering quinine solution. While alighted at the feeder station the stimuli were likely not visible to the bee. The “constant stimulus” training group saw the same stimulus throughout. For the “switched stimulus” training group, the CS + changed to the CS− during feeding. Learning was slower in the “switched stimulus” training group compared to the constant stimulus” group, but the training groups did not differ in their learning performance or the extent to which they generalised their learning. The information conflict in the “switched stimulus” group did not interfere with what had been learned. Differences between the “switched” and “constant stimulus” groups were greater for bees trained on a horizontal CS + than a vertical CS + suggesting bees differ in their processing of vertically and horizontally oriented stimuli. We discuss how bumblebees might resolve this type of information conflict so effectively, drawing on the known neurobiology of their visual learning system.

大黄蜂是如何处理到达和离开花朵时看到的相互矛盾的信息的
蜜蜂是灵活的、适应性强的学习者,能够学习在它们觅食的花朵到达和离开时看到的刺激。这使蜜蜂有可能学习与觅食事件相关的所有信息,但它也提出了管理不相关、不一致或相互冲突的信息的挑战。在这里,我们研究了在喂食前后向大黄蜂展示相互矛盾的视觉信息是如何影响它们的学习速度和学习内容的。蜜蜂被训练到安装在电脑显示器前的喂食站。在每个馈线站后面的监视器上显示视觉刺激。正向强化刺激(CS +)标记喂食者提供蔗糖溶液。负强化刺激(CS−)标记提供奎宁溶液的喂食者。当蜜蜂在喂食站下车时,这些刺激可能是看不见的。“持续刺激”训练组始终看到相同的刺激。对于“转换刺激”训练组,在喂食过程中CS +变为CS−。与“恒定刺激”组相比,“转换刺激”组的学习速度较慢,但两组的学习表现和学习泛化程度并无差异。在“转换刺激”组中,信息冲突并没有影响所学到的知识。“切换”组和“恒定刺激”组之间的差异对于水平CS +训练的蜜蜂比垂直CS +训练的蜜蜂更大,这表明蜜蜂在处理垂直和水平定向刺激方面存在差异。我们讨论了大黄蜂如何有效地解决这种类型的信息冲突,利用已知的视觉学习系统的神经生物学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Cognition
Animal Cognition 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework. Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures. The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信