Validation of a 3D whole-body scanning system to collect anthropometric data from a working-age population for ergonomic design

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Alexander Ackermann , Sascha Wischniewski , Dominik Bonin , Anne-Kathrin Gaida , Thomas Jaitner
{"title":"Validation of a 3D whole-body scanning system to collect anthropometric data from a working-age population for ergonomic design","authors":"Alexander Ackermann ,&nbsp;Sascha Wischniewski ,&nbsp;Dominik Bonin ,&nbsp;Anne-Kathrin Gaida ,&nbsp;Thomas Jaitner","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A fundamental aspect of ergonomic design is the incorporation of anthropometric data to ensure usability and correct fit. If anthropometric dimensions from ISO 7250-1 are collected with a 3D body scanning system, the comparability with the manual measuring methods needs to be investigated according to ISO 20685-1. Thus, the aim of this study was to validate the 3D whole-body scanner Vitus Bodyscan in combination with the Anthroscan software. In this context, furthermore the influence of a color landmarking procedure and the use of the proprietary Anthroscan algorithm to generate watertight meshes prior to the measurement process was examined. The validation study was conducted with a diverse group of 44 adults between the ages of 18 and 67 residing in Germany. Color landmarking was performed for 16 anatomical landmarks and four 3D data types were used to determine scan-derived anthropometric dimensions (point cloud, non-watertight mesh with color information, watertight mesh without and with color information). Results show that of the 32 analyzed anthropometric dimensions, comparable scan-derived values could be obtained for 20 (62.5%) of them using different types of 3D data. Various factors (e.g., posture and tissue compression) generally affect the comparability of the two measuring methods. Nevertheless, color landmarks substantially improved comparability for some anthropometric dimensions by reducing potential landmarking errors. These findings need be considered in the collection and utilization of anthropoemtric data using a comparable 3D body scanning system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 103698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fundamental aspect of ergonomic design is the incorporation of anthropometric data to ensure usability and correct fit. If anthropometric dimensions from ISO 7250-1 are collected with a 3D body scanning system, the comparability with the manual measuring methods needs to be investigated according to ISO 20685-1. Thus, the aim of this study was to validate the 3D whole-body scanner Vitus Bodyscan in combination with the Anthroscan software. In this context, furthermore the influence of a color landmarking procedure and the use of the proprietary Anthroscan algorithm to generate watertight meshes prior to the measurement process was examined. The validation study was conducted with a diverse group of 44 adults between the ages of 18 and 67 residing in Germany. Color landmarking was performed for 16 anatomical landmarks and four 3D data types were used to determine scan-derived anthropometric dimensions (point cloud, non-watertight mesh with color information, watertight mesh without and with color information). Results show that of the 32 analyzed anthropometric dimensions, comparable scan-derived values could be obtained for 20 (62.5%) of them using different types of 3D data. Various factors (e.g., posture and tissue compression) generally affect the comparability of the two measuring methods. Nevertheless, color landmarks substantially improved comparability for some anthropometric dimensions by reducing potential landmarking errors. These findings need be considered in the collection and utilization of anthropoemtric data using a comparable 3D body scanning system.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信