‘This is my magical place here’. Linking cultural ecosystem services and landscape elements in urban green spaces

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Marta Derek , Sylwia Kulczyk , Tomasz Grzyb , Edyta Woźniak
{"title":"‘This is my magical place here’. Linking cultural ecosystem services and landscape elements in urban green spaces","authors":"Marta Derek ,&nbsp;Sylwia Kulczyk ,&nbsp;Tomasz Grzyb ,&nbsp;Edyta Woźniak","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper aims to understand how cultural ecosystem services (CES) are shaped in public urban green spaces. Landscape, understood as a hierarchical complex of abiotic, biotic, and human-made elements, is considered as the basis of CES supply. Since CES are intrinsically linked to the on-site experience, we invited 27 experts to ‘walk and talk’ about landscape in five distinctive Public Urban Green Spaces (PUGS) in Warsaw. This qualitative approach allowed us to observe the process of co-production of CES by addressing three specific research aims: (1) to identify the relationships between biotic, abiotic, and human-made elements in PUGS; (2) to establish links between different types of CES provided by PUGS; and (3) to explore the links between CES and specific landscape elements within PUGS.</div><div>The results indicate that CES are co-produced by all landscape elements. Interviewees most frequently mentioned trees, birds, mammals, and water. In terms of CES, experts most often referred to active recreation, aesthetic experience, and passive recreation as benefits provided by urban greenery. Other CES included opportunities for social interactions, education, a sense of place, and tranquillity. The analysis also revealed several notable co-occurrences between ecosystem services and landscape elements as discussed by the interviewees. Active recreation was particularly distinctive here – unlike other CES, it was primarily associated with abiotic elements of the landscape, with landform being the most frequently mentioned. For other CES biotic elements were more important than abiotic.</div><div>This study’s findings suggest that people perceive the landscape holistically, whether they engage in recreational activities, admire the beauty of nature, or seek tranquillity. It has an important implications for future research of CES, by indicating that CES should be studied comprehensively, incorporating different elements of landscape which co-create them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 101699"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041625000038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to understand how cultural ecosystem services (CES) are shaped in public urban green spaces. Landscape, understood as a hierarchical complex of abiotic, biotic, and human-made elements, is considered as the basis of CES supply. Since CES are intrinsically linked to the on-site experience, we invited 27 experts to ‘walk and talk’ about landscape in five distinctive Public Urban Green Spaces (PUGS) in Warsaw. This qualitative approach allowed us to observe the process of co-production of CES by addressing three specific research aims: (1) to identify the relationships between biotic, abiotic, and human-made elements in PUGS; (2) to establish links between different types of CES provided by PUGS; and (3) to explore the links between CES and specific landscape elements within PUGS.
The results indicate that CES are co-produced by all landscape elements. Interviewees most frequently mentioned trees, birds, mammals, and water. In terms of CES, experts most often referred to active recreation, aesthetic experience, and passive recreation as benefits provided by urban greenery. Other CES included opportunities for social interactions, education, a sense of place, and tranquillity. The analysis also revealed several notable co-occurrences between ecosystem services and landscape elements as discussed by the interviewees. Active recreation was particularly distinctive here – unlike other CES, it was primarily associated with abiotic elements of the landscape, with landform being the most frequently mentioned. For other CES biotic elements were more important than abiotic.
This study’s findings suggest that people perceive the landscape holistically, whether they engage in recreational activities, admire the beauty of nature, or seek tranquillity. It has an important implications for future research of CES, by indicating that CES should be studied comprehensively, incorporating different elements of landscape which co-create them.
“这是我神奇的地方。”将城市绿地中的文化生态系统服务与景观要素相结合
本文旨在了解城市公共绿地中文化生态系统服务(CES)是如何形成的。景观被理解为非生物、生物和人为元素的分层复合体,被认为是CES供应的基础。由于CES与现场体验有着内在的联系,我们邀请了27位专家在华沙五个不同的公共城市绿地(PUGS)中“散步和谈论”景观。这种定性方法使我们能够通过三个具体的研究目标来观察CES的共同生产过程:(1)确定PUGS中生物、非生物和人为元素之间的关系;(2)在PUGS提供的不同类型的CES之间建立链接;(3)探索城市生态系统与特定景观要素之间的联系。结果表明,生态系统是各景观要素共同产生的。受访者最常提到的是树木、鸟类、哺乳动物和水。就消费电子产品而言,专家们最常提到的是城市绿化带来的积极娱乐、审美体验和被动娱乐。其他CES还包括社交互动、教育、地方感和宁静的机会。分析还揭示了受访者所讨论的生态系统服务和景观要素之间的几个显著的共生现象。与其他CES不同的是,这里的活动娱乐特别独特,它主要与景观的非生物元素有关,地形是最常被提及的。对于其他CES,生物因素比非生物因素更重要。这项研究的结果表明,无论是从事娱乐活动,欣赏自然之美,还是寻求宁静,人们都是从整体上看待景观的。这对未来的景观研究具有重要的启示意义,指出应综合研究景观景观,将不同的景观要素结合起来共同创造景观景观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystem Services
Ecosystem Services ECOLOGYENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly. Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信