How ecosystem services are co-produced: a critical review identifying multiple research framings

IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
A.J. Woodhead , J.O. Kenter , C.D. Thomas , L.C. Stringer
{"title":"How ecosystem services are co-produced: a critical review identifying multiple research framings","authors":"A.J. Woodhead ,&nbsp;J.O. Kenter ,&nbsp;C.D. Thomas ,&nbsp;L.C. Stringer","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How ecosystem services are produced remains a critical research gap that must be addressed if services are to persist under on-going and future environmental change. Interest in this area is coalescing under the term ‘co-production’, which recognises that services are generated through interactions between social and ecological processes. Here we conduct a critical review of academic research into the co-production of ecosystem services, aiming to understand the foundations of this emergent field. Despite its recent origins, we identify four different framings as to how ecosystem services are co-produced and discuss their different epistemological bases and applications. The four framings are: <em>input focused</em>, which identifies and measures the inputs underpinning co-production; <em>actor focused</em>, understanding who is involved in co-production; <em>context focused</em> that situates co-production in social relations and place; and a more disparate <em>disciplines focused</em> approach, which highlights alternative conceptualisations of co-production based on diverse disciplinary and conceptual perspectives. There is overlap and dialogue between the four approaches, and we identify examples of how and where to operationalise these framings together to achieve a more holistic understanding of co-production processes. Nevertheless, behind these different framings are differences over what is or is not considered co-produced, and thus what is considered a valid field of inquiry within co-production research. This indicates ontological differences on the social construction of ecosystem services and the role of people therein. We argue that diversity in co-production research is important for representing the complexity of human-environment interactions, but that a more explicit acknowledgement of the ontological assumptions underpinning co-production is crucial if this area of research is to be analytically useful for the management of current and future ecosystem services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 101694"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624001013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How ecosystem services are produced remains a critical research gap that must be addressed if services are to persist under on-going and future environmental change. Interest in this area is coalescing under the term ‘co-production’, which recognises that services are generated through interactions between social and ecological processes. Here we conduct a critical review of academic research into the co-production of ecosystem services, aiming to understand the foundations of this emergent field. Despite its recent origins, we identify four different framings as to how ecosystem services are co-produced and discuss their different epistemological bases and applications. The four framings are: input focused, which identifies and measures the inputs underpinning co-production; actor focused, understanding who is involved in co-production; context focused that situates co-production in social relations and place; and a more disparate disciplines focused approach, which highlights alternative conceptualisations of co-production based on diverse disciplinary and conceptual perspectives. There is overlap and dialogue between the four approaches, and we identify examples of how and where to operationalise these framings together to achieve a more holistic understanding of co-production processes. Nevertheless, behind these different framings are differences over what is or is not considered co-produced, and thus what is considered a valid field of inquiry within co-production research. This indicates ontological differences on the social construction of ecosystem services and the role of people therein. We argue that diversity in co-production research is important for representing the complexity of human-environment interactions, but that a more explicit acknowledgement of the ontological assumptions underpinning co-production is crucial if this area of research is to be analytically useful for the management of current and future ecosystem services.
生态系统服务如何共同产生:确定多种研究框架的批判性审查
如何产生生态系统服务仍然是一个关键的研究空白,如果服务要在当前和未来的环境变化中持续存在,就必须解决这个空白。人们对这一领域的兴趣在“合作生产”一词下凝聚在一起,它认识到服务是通过社会和生态过程之间的相互作用产生的。在这里,我们对生态系统服务共同生产的学术研究进行了批判性的回顾,旨在了解这一新兴领域的基础。尽管其起源较近,但我们确定了四种不同的框架,以了解生态系统服务是如何共同产生的,并讨论了它们不同的认识论基础和应用。这四种框架是:以投入为重点,确定和衡量支撑合作生产的投入;以演员为中心,了解谁参与了合作制作;注重环境,将合作生产置于社会关系和社会地位;还有一种更侧重于不同学科的方法,它强调了基于不同学科和概念观点的合作制作的替代概念。这四种方法之间存在重叠和对话,我们确定了如何以及在何处共同操作这些框架的例子,以实现对合作生产过程的更全面的理解。然而,在这些不同的框架背后,是什么被认为是或不被认为是联合生产的差异,因此在联合生产研究中,什么被认为是一个有效的调查领域。这表明生态系统服务的社会建构和人在其中的作用存在本体论差异。我们认为,合作生产研究的多样性对于代表人类与环境相互作用的复杂性是重要的,但如果这一研究领域要对当前和未来生态系统服务的分析管理有用,那么更明确地承认支持合作生产的本体论假设是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystem Services
Ecosystem Services ECOLOGYENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly. Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信