Spectral bands vs. vegetation indices: An AutoML approach for processing tomato yield predictions based on Sentinel-2 imagery

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Nicoleta Darra , Borja Espejo-Garcia , Vassilis Psiroukis , Emmanouil Psomiadis , Spyros Fountas
{"title":"Spectral bands vs. vegetation indices: An AutoML approach for processing tomato yield predictions based on Sentinel-2 imagery","authors":"Nicoleta Darra ,&nbsp;Borja Espejo-Garcia ,&nbsp;Vassilis Psiroukis ,&nbsp;Emmanouil Psomiadis ,&nbsp;Spyros Fountas","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2025.100805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Predicting tomato yield is crucial for agricultural production planning, management, market supply, and risk management. While yield prediction in precision agriculture presents a complex challenge, advancements in remote sensor technologies have greatly improved the accuracy and feasibility of these predictions. In this paper, three modeling approaches were implemented to estimate processing tomato yield based on satellite data, covering 152 fields across two growing periods. Sentinel-2 spectral bands and Vegetation Indices (VIs) captured at 5-day intervals during the growth periods, used as input parameters in an AutoML pipeline. The first approach aimed to identify the optimal timeframe and the most effective spectral bands and VIs, such as NDVI and RVI. Modelling results indicated that Red/Red Edge/NIR bands performed well in predicting yield, with the period between 75 to 90 days post-transplanting identified as the optimal timeframe for yieldpredictions (R² of 0.56). The second approach incorporated inter-date VIs, utilizing bands from different dates, leading to a significant improvement in performance with an R² of 0.61 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 12ton/ha. The third approach involved band combinations to enhance performance, where specific bands, including the Bands 4, 6, and 12, collectively achieved the highest R² of 0.65. Using feature extraction algorithms such as PCA, UMAP, and autoencoder partially contributed to improved performance while using the same VIs on consecutive different dates. By utilizing a higher number of bands and dates without the constraint of a VI formula demonstrated the potential for enhanced model accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100805"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375525000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting tomato yield is crucial for agricultural production planning, management, market supply, and risk management. While yield prediction in precision agriculture presents a complex challenge, advancements in remote sensor technologies have greatly improved the accuracy and feasibility of these predictions. In this paper, three modeling approaches were implemented to estimate processing tomato yield based on satellite data, covering 152 fields across two growing periods. Sentinel-2 spectral bands and Vegetation Indices (VIs) captured at 5-day intervals during the growth periods, used as input parameters in an AutoML pipeline. The first approach aimed to identify the optimal timeframe and the most effective spectral bands and VIs, such as NDVI and RVI. Modelling results indicated that Red/Red Edge/NIR bands performed well in predicting yield, with the period between 75 to 90 days post-transplanting identified as the optimal timeframe for yieldpredictions (R² of 0.56). The second approach incorporated inter-date VIs, utilizing bands from different dates, leading to a significant improvement in performance with an R² of 0.61 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 12ton/ha. The third approach involved band combinations to enhance performance, where specific bands, including the Bands 4, 6, and 12, collectively achieved the highest R² of 0.65. Using feature extraction algorithms such as PCA, UMAP, and autoencoder partially contributed to improved performance while using the same VIs on consecutive different dates. By utilizing a higher number of bands and dates without the constraint of a VI formula demonstrated the potential for enhanced model accuracy.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信