Product tracing or component tracing? Blockchain adoption in a two-echelon supply chain management

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Ardavan Babaei , Majid Khedmati , Mohammad Reza Akbari Jokar , Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee
{"title":"Product tracing or component tracing? Blockchain adoption in a two-echelon supply chain management","authors":"Ardavan Babaei ,&nbsp;Majid Khedmati ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Akbari Jokar ,&nbsp;Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumer awareness of product authenticity and carbon footprint tracing are among the most remarkable reasons for adopting blockchain in the supply chain in today’s world. However, the research literature has not yet examined specific ways to adopt blockchain in the supply chain. This study aims to develop a decision support tool to deal with the adoption of blockchain technology to design a two-echelon supply chain. In this regard, four specific cases for integrating supply chain and blockchain are developed based on types of tracing and block generation authority. In product tracing, green products are investigated throughout the supply chain, while in component tracing, green products are examined between the components of the supply chain. As it is necessary to record and verify the supply chain information by authorities in the blockchain network, in this work, such authorities are taken into account for both links and members of the supply chain. As far as we know, this is the first attempt to classify the various methods of adopting blockchain in Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) and propose mathematical optimization models related to them. In this line, four Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) models with the aim of minimizing the costs related to the physical supply chain and blockchain deployment are developed for the integration of the supply chain with blockchain technology. They are treated by the Branch and Efficiency (B&amp;E) algorithm and Simultaneous Data Envelopment Analysis (SDEA) model considering common (cost and service) and innovative (blockchain) criteria. The results showed that link-based and component tracing models are cost-effective. In addition, the cost objective function of green product tracing is more sensitive to the number of blocks than that of component tracing. Eventually, the study provides great opportunities for decision-makers and managers to understand how to adopt blockchain in terms of supply chain network characteristics, cost, transparency, and service.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 110789"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224009112","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer awareness of product authenticity and carbon footprint tracing are among the most remarkable reasons for adopting blockchain in the supply chain in today’s world. However, the research literature has not yet examined specific ways to adopt blockchain in the supply chain. This study aims to develop a decision support tool to deal with the adoption of blockchain technology to design a two-echelon supply chain. In this regard, four specific cases for integrating supply chain and blockchain are developed based on types of tracing and block generation authority. In product tracing, green products are investigated throughout the supply chain, while in component tracing, green products are examined between the components of the supply chain. As it is necessary to record and verify the supply chain information by authorities in the blockchain network, in this work, such authorities are taken into account for both links and members of the supply chain. As far as we know, this is the first attempt to classify the various methods of adopting blockchain in Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) and propose mathematical optimization models related to them. In this line, four Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) models with the aim of minimizing the costs related to the physical supply chain and blockchain deployment are developed for the integration of the supply chain with blockchain technology. They are treated by the Branch and Efficiency (B&E) algorithm and Simultaneous Data Envelopment Analysis (SDEA) model considering common (cost and service) and innovative (blockchain) criteria. The results showed that link-based and component tracing models are cost-effective. In addition, the cost objective function of green product tracing is more sensitive to the number of blocks than that of component tracing. Eventually, the study provides great opportunities for decision-makers and managers to understand how to adopt blockchain in terms of supply chain network characteristics, cost, transparency, and service.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信