Investigating the relationships between listening strategies and speaking performance in integrated listening-to-speak tasks

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ying Xu , Mengni Yang , Xiaodong Li
{"title":"Investigating the relationships between listening strategies and speaking performance in integrated listening-to-speak tasks","authors":"Ying Xu ,&nbsp;Mengni Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrated tasks have been increasingly used in language assessments. However, existing research on integrated tasks has emphasized productive skills, specifically writing, while little is known about the interrelationships between listening comprehension and speaking performance in integrated speaking tasks. This study collected empirical data from 210 Chinese EFL learners through a custom-designed questionnaire to investigate listening strategies and their relationships with listening-to-speak task performance. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis of the questionnaire identified five distinct listening strategies: comprehension evaluation (COE), selective attention (SEA), inferencing (INF), preparation (PRE) and fixation (FIX). Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between the use of five listening strategies and task performance scores. Multiple regression analysis further indicated that three of these strategies are strong predictors of performance across different scoring dimensions. Specifically, COE positively influenced scores in all four dimensions assessed: (1) <em>Grammar, Vocabulary and Expression</em>; (2) <em>Retelling Content</em>; (3) <em>Pronunciation and Intonation</em>; (4) <em>Fluency</em>. Additionally, SEA was found to affect scores in <em>Retelling Content</em> as well as <em>Pronunciation and Intonation</em>. In contrast, FIX had a significantly negative effect on <em>Retelling Content</em>. These findings could improve our understanding of L2 listening strategy use in integrated listening-to-speak tasks and carry implications for L2 listening instruction and assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103586"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24003713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrated tasks have been increasingly used in language assessments. However, existing research on integrated tasks has emphasized productive skills, specifically writing, while little is known about the interrelationships between listening comprehension and speaking performance in integrated speaking tasks. This study collected empirical data from 210 Chinese EFL learners through a custom-designed questionnaire to investigate listening strategies and their relationships with listening-to-speak task performance. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis of the questionnaire identified five distinct listening strategies: comprehension evaluation (COE), selective attention (SEA), inferencing (INF), preparation (PRE) and fixation (FIX). Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between the use of five listening strategies and task performance scores. Multiple regression analysis further indicated that three of these strategies are strong predictors of performance across different scoring dimensions. Specifically, COE positively influenced scores in all four dimensions assessed: (1) Grammar, Vocabulary and Expression; (2) Retelling Content; (3) Pronunciation and Intonation; (4) Fluency. Additionally, SEA was found to affect scores in Retelling Content as well as Pronunciation and Intonation. In contrast, FIX had a significantly negative effect on Retelling Content. These findings could improve our understanding of L2 listening strategy use in integrated listening-to-speak tasks and carry implications for L2 listening instruction and assessment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信