{"title":"Teachers' AI readiness in Chinese as a Foreign Language education: Scale development and validation","authors":"Nuoen Li , Yu Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has presented a promising opportunity to enhance educational practices. To promote the integration of AI in Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL) education, this study adopted Creswell and Plano Clark's (2011) exploratory instrument design model to develop a CFL Teachers' AI Readiness Scale (CFLT-AIRS) for assessing teachers' propensity to embrace AI technologies. The dimensions and corresponding items were developed through in-depth interviews, literature analysis, expert reviews, and a pilot test in sequence. The initial scale was validated through two rounds of data collection for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 333) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 353), respectively. The results indicated that CFL teachers' AI readiness can be conceptualized from three perspectives: personal assets (<em>AI-TPACK</em> and <em>technological innovativeness</em>), value-cost beliefs (<em>perceived value</em> and <em>perceived cost</em>), and contextual resource evaluations (<em>institutional</em> support and <em>facilitating condition</em>). Based on the developed 23-item AI readiness scale, the nomological validity was further established by exploring the influences of teachers' AI readiness on satisfaction with AI and continuous intention to use AI. The findings offer a clearer conceptual framework for AI readiness from the teachers' perspective and provide valuable insights into the integration of AI in CFL education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103597"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25000077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has presented a promising opportunity to enhance educational practices. To promote the integration of AI in Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL) education, this study adopted Creswell and Plano Clark's (2011) exploratory instrument design model to develop a CFL Teachers' AI Readiness Scale (CFLT-AIRS) for assessing teachers' propensity to embrace AI technologies. The dimensions and corresponding items were developed through in-depth interviews, literature analysis, expert reviews, and a pilot test in sequence. The initial scale was validated through two rounds of data collection for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 333) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 353), respectively. The results indicated that CFL teachers' AI readiness can be conceptualized from three perspectives: personal assets (AI-TPACK and technological innovativeness), value-cost beliefs (perceived value and perceived cost), and contextual resource evaluations (institutional support and facilitating condition). Based on the developed 23-item AI readiness scale, the nomological validity was further established by exploring the influences of teachers' AI readiness on satisfaction with AI and continuous intention to use AI. The findings offer a clearer conceptual framework for AI readiness from the teachers' perspective and provide valuable insights into the integration of AI in CFL education.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.