Comparison of mitigating DDoS attacks in software defined networking and IoT platforms

Sivanesan. N , N. Parthiban , S. Vijay , S.N. Sheela
{"title":"Comparison of mitigating DDoS attacks in software defined networking and IoT platforms","authors":"Sivanesan. N ,&nbsp;N. Parthiban ,&nbsp;S. Vijay ,&nbsp;S.N. Sheela","doi":"10.1016/j.csa.2024.100080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Software-Defined Networking (SDN) paradigm redefines the term \"network\" by enabling network managers to programmatically initialize, control, alter, and govern network behavior. Network engineers benefit from SDN's ability to rapidly track networks, centrally manage networks, and quickly and effectively detect malicious traffic and connection failure. The attacker will have total control over the system if he is able to access the main controller. The system's resources can be completely exhausted by Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, rendering the controller's services entirely unavailable. The low computational and power capabilities of everyday Internet of Things (IoT) devices render the controller highly susceptible to these attacks; the IoT ecosystem prioritizes functionality over security features, making DDoS attacks a significant problem. This paper conducts a comparative study on the use of machine learning (ML) to mitigate DDoS attack traffic, distinguishing it from benign traffic. This is done to prevent several assaults and to provide mitigation security threats in the network, according to specific requirements. So, the study used machine learning-based techniques to make both traditional and SDN-IoT environments less vulnerable to DDoS attacks. Therefore, the primary goals of the comparative study are to determine which SDN and SDN-IoT platform is better at detecting DDoS attacks and to evaluate how well both platforms work when combined with ML techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100351,"journal":{"name":"Cyber Security and Applications","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyber Security and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772918424000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Software-Defined Networking (SDN) paradigm redefines the term "network" by enabling network managers to programmatically initialize, control, alter, and govern network behavior. Network engineers benefit from SDN's ability to rapidly track networks, centrally manage networks, and quickly and effectively detect malicious traffic and connection failure. The attacker will have total control over the system if he is able to access the main controller. The system's resources can be completely exhausted by Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, rendering the controller's services entirely unavailable. The low computational and power capabilities of everyday Internet of Things (IoT) devices render the controller highly susceptible to these attacks; the IoT ecosystem prioritizes functionality over security features, making DDoS attacks a significant problem. This paper conducts a comparative study on the use of machine learning (ML) to mitigate DDoS attack traffic, distinguishing it from benign traffic. This is done to prevent several assaults and to provide mitigation security threats in the network, according to specific requirements. So, the study used machine learning-based techniques to make both traditional and SDN-IoT environments less vulnerable to DDoS attacks. Therefore, the primary goals of the comparative study are to determine which SDN and SDN-IoT platform is better at detecting DDoS attacks and to evaluate how well both platforms work when combined with ML techniques.
软件定义网络和物联网平台中缓解DDoS攻击的比较
软件定义网络(SDN)范例通过允许网络管理人员以编程方式初始化、控制、更改和管理网络行为,重新定义了术语“网络”。网络工程师受益于SDN快速跟踪网络、集中管理网络、快速有效检测恶意流量和连接故障的能力。如果攻击者能够访问主控制器,他将完全控制系统。系统资源可能会被DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service)攻击耗尽,导致控制器的业务完全不可用。日常物联网(IoT)设备的低计算和功耗能力使控制器极易受到这些攻击;物联网生态系统优先考虑功能而不是安全特性,这使得DDoS攻击成为一个重大问题。本文对使用机器学习(ML)来缓解DDoS攻击流量进行了比较研究,将其与良性流量区分开来。这样做是为了防止多种攻击,并根据具体需求减轻网络中的安全威胁。因此,该研究使用了基于机器学习的技术,使传统和SDN-IoT环境不那么容易受到DDoS攻击。因此,比较研究的主要目标是确定哪个SDN和SDN- iot平台更擅长检测DDoS攻击,并评估这两个平台在与ML技术结合时的工作情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信