Comparison of mitigating DDoS attacks in software defined networking and IoT platforms

Sivanesan. N , N. Parthiban , S. Vijay , S.N. Sheela
{"title":"Comparison of mitigating DDoS attacks in software defined networking and IoT platforms","authors":"Sivanesan. N ,&nbsp;N. Parthiban ,&nbsp;S. Vijay ,&nbsp;S.N. Sheela","doi":"10.1016/j.csa.2024.100080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Software-Defined Networking (SDN) paradigm redefines the term \"network\" by enabling network managers to programmatically initialize, control, alter, and govern network behavior. Network engineers benefit from SDN's ability to rapidly track networks, centrally manage networks, and quickly and effectively detect malicious traffic and connection failure. The attacker will have total control over the system if he is able to access the main controller. The system's resources can be completely exhausted by Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, rendering the controller's services entirely unavailable. The low computational and power capabilities of everyday Internet of Things (IoT) devices render the controller highly susceptible to these attacks; the IoT ecosystem prioritizes functionality over security features, making DDoS attacks a significant problem. This paper conducts a comparative study on the use of machine learning (ML) to mitigate DDoS attack traffic, distinguishing it from benign traffic. This is done to prevent several assaults and to provide mitigation security threats in the network, according to specific requirements. So, the study used machine learning-based techniques to make both traditional and SDN-IoT environments less vulnerable to DDoS attacks. Therefore, the primary goals of the comparative study are to determine which SDN and SDN-IoT platform is better at detecting DDoS attacks and to evaluate how well both platforms work when combined with ML techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100351,"journal":{"name":"Cyber Security and Applications","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyber Security and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772918424000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Software-Defined Networking (SDN) paradigm redefines the term "network" by enabling network managers to programmatically initialize, control, alter, and govern network behavior. Network engineers benefit from SDN's ability to rapidly track networks, centrally manage networks, and quickly and effectively detect malicious traffic and connection failure. The attacker will have total control over the system if he is able to access the main controller. The system's resources can be completely exhausted by Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, rendering the controller's services entirely unavailable. The low computational and power capabilities of everyday Internet of Things (IoT) devices render the controller highly susceptible to these attacks; the IoT ecosystem prioritizes functionality over security features, making DDoS attacks a significant problem. This paper conducts a comparative study on the use of machine learning (ML) to mitigate DDoS attack traffic, distinguishing it from benign traffic. This is done to prevent several assaults and to provide mitigation security threats in the network, according to specific requirements. So, the study used machine learning-based techniques to make both traditional and SDN-IoT environments less vulnerable to DDoS attacks. Therefore, the primary goals of the comparative study are to determine which SDN and SDN-IoT platform is better at detecting DDoS attacks and to evaluate how well both platforms work when combined with ML techniques.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信