The impact of task motivation on learners’ attention to form and subsequent learning in interactive tasks

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Phil Hiver , Phung Dao
{"title":"The impact of task motivation on learners’ attention to form and subsequent learning in interactive tasks","authors":"Phil Hiver ,&nbsp;Phung Dao","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we investigated the impact of task motivation, conceptualized through situated expectancy value theory, on learners' attention to form and subsequent learning in oral interactive tasks. We hypothesized that the type and quality of learners' task motivation impacts how learners attend to, perform, and learn from tasks. In dyads, 106 Vietnamese learners of English performed an opinion-gap task and an information-gap task. Their attention to form in these oral tasks was measured through LREs which were coded for the frequency, type, and their resolution. We developed a tailor-made test for each dyad, based on their interaction, that included the formal features discussed in their LREs and administered this as a delayed test to assess whether their attention to form had resulted in subsequent learning of these features. Our preliminary analyses tested and established validity for all measures of task motivation using factor analytic models. Our main results showed that learners did indeed focus on different aspects of form across the different tasks, but task type did not affect learners' task motivation. Learners expected to succeed equally well in both tasks and perceived the value and cost of performing both tasks as similar. Task motivation was, consequently, not a significant predictor of learners' focus on form in the number and type of LREs produced, how those LREs were resolved, or learners' subsequent learning. Finally, our analyses suggested that learners' specific focus on form was linked to their subsequent learning in the opinion gap task though not in the information gap task. We discuss the implications of task-specific measures of motivation and the ways in which learners’ task performance and focus on form during task completion drives actual learning independent of task motivation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103609"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25000193","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the impact of task motivation, conceptualized through situated expectancy value theory, on learners' attention to form and subsequent learning in oral interactive tasks. We hypothesized that the type and quality of learners' task motivation impacts how learners attend to, perform, and learn from tasks. In dyads, 106 Vietnamese learners of English performed an opinion-gap task and an information-gap task. Their attention to form in these oral tasks was measured through LREs which were coded for the frequency, type, and their resolution. We developed a tailor-made test for each dyad, based on their interaction, that included the formal features discussed in their LREs and administered this as a delayed test to assess whether their attention to form had resulted in subsequent learning of these features. Our preliminary analyses tested and established validity for all measures of task motivation using factor analytic models. Our main results showed that learners did indeed focus on different aspects of form across the different tasks, but task type did not affect learners' task motivation. Learners expected to succeed equally well in both tasks and perceived the value and cost of performing both tasks as similar. Task motivation was, consequently, not a significant predictor of learners' focus on form in the number and type of LREs produced, how those LREs were resolved, or learners' subsequent learning. Finally, our analyses suggested that learners' specific focus on form was linked to their subsequent learning in the opinion gap task though not in the information gap task. We discuss the implications of task-specific measures of motivation and the ways in which learners’ task performance and focus on form during task completion drives actual learning independent of task motivation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信