{"title":"ChatGPT affordance for logic learning strategies and its usefulness for developing knowledge and quality of logic in English argumentative writing","authors":"Ruofei Zhang , Di Zou , Gary Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Logic learning is essential for developing knowledge and quality of logic in English argumentative writing. Its main strategies include gathering logic instructions (Gathering), understanding logical concepts (Understanding), exercising knowledge of logic (Exercising), analysing logic in authentic writings (Analysing), and revising and creating logical links under guidance (Crafting) – which ChatGPT may afford. However, there has been limited exploration of ChatGPT-based logic learning. To address this gap, we developed a GPT-4-based logic learning bot and engaged 40 EFL university students, exploring ChatGPT's affordance for logic learning strategies and its usefulness for developing logical knowledge and quality of logic in English argumentative writing. We measured ChatGPT affordance by analysing learner-bot conversations and evaluated the usefulness of ChatGPT affordance through pre-post knowledge tests and essay writing tasks. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted. Our findings revealed that ChatGPT afforded 12 sub-strategies of logic learning, with Gathering and Exercising strategies being the most frequently used. ChatGPT-based logic learning strategies, especially Gathering and Exercising strategies, significantly developed knowledge and quality of logic in English argumentative writing. Through analysing the results, we identified ChatGPT features influencing the frequency and effectiveness of logical learning strategies and offered implications for implementing ChatGPT-based logic learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 103561"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24003439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Logic learning is essential for developing knowledge and quality of logic in English argumentative writing. Its main strategies include gathering logic instructions (Gathering), understanding logical concepts (Understanding), exercising knowledge of logic (Exercising), analysing logic in authentic writings (Analysing), and revising and creating logical links under guidance (Crafting) – which ChatGPT may afford. However, there has been limited exploration of ChatGPT-based logic learning. To address this gap, we developed a GPT-4-based logic learning bot and engaged 40 EFL university students, exploring ChatGPT's affordance for logic learning strategies and its usefulness for developing logical knowledge and quality of logic in English argumentative writing. We measured ChatGPT affordance by analysing learner-bot conversations and evaluated the usefulness of ChatGPT affordance through pre-post knowledge tests and essay writing tasks. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted. Our findings revealed that ChatGPT afforded 12 sub-strategies of logic learning, with Gathering and Exercising strategies being the most frequently used. ChatGPT-based logic learning strategies, especially Gathering and Exercising strategies, significantly developed knowledge and quality of logic in English argumentative writing. Through analysing the results, we identified ChatGPT features influencing the frequency and effectiveness of logical learning strategies and offered implications for implementing ChatGPT-based logic learning.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.