High-accuracy lung disease classification via logistic regression and advanced feature extraction techniques

IF 5 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Swapandeep Kaur , Sheifali Gupta , Deepali Gupta , Sapna Juneja , Ali Nauman , Mudassir Khan , Izhar Husain , Asharul Islam , Saurav Mallik
{"title":"High-accuracy lung disease classification via logistic regression and advanced feature extraction techniques","authors":"Swapandeep Kaur ,&nbsp;Sheifali Gupta ,&nbsp;Deepali Gupta ,&nbsp;Sapna Juneja ,&nbsp;Ali Nauman ,&nbsp;Mudassir Khan ,&nbsp;Izhar Husain ,&nbsp;Asharul Islam ,&nbsp;Saurav Mallik","doi":"10.1016/j.eij.2024.100596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lung disease diagnosis through medical imaging integrated with machine learning has seen significant advancements. This study investigates the optimization of lung disease classification by exploring various preprocessing, feature extraction, and machine-learning classifier combinations. Our methodology begins with an input dataset of lung X-ray images, which undergoes preprocessing steps such as image sharpening and histogram equalization to enhance image quality. Subsequently, feature extraction techniques, including Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), and Local Binary Patterns (LBP), are applied to the pre-processed images. We evaluate the effectiveness of several machine learning classifiers—Naive Bayes (NB), K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—on both original and pre-processed images to determine the optimal classifier. Following the selection of the best-performing classifier, i.e., Logistic Regression, we further optimize the classification process by applying combinations of the feature extraction techniques (SIFT + HOG, SIFT + LBP, HOG + LBP, SIFT + HOG + LBP). The SIFT + HOG + LBP feature extraction, in combination with Logistic Regression, performed the best on the original images, obtaining an accuracy of 97.12 %, precision of 97.97 %, recall of 97.55 %, and F1-score of 97.76 %. Our study presents the comparative performance of each preprocessing and feature extraction technique, both individually and in combination, in bringing about an improvement in the accuracy of lung disease detection. The study concludes with the identification of the most effective preprocessing and feature extraction combination, coupled with the best machine learning classifier, providing a robust framework for enhanced lung disease diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56010,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Informatics Journal","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100596"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110866524001592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung disease diagnosis through medical imaging integrated with machine learning has seen significant advancements. This study investigates the optimization of lung disease classification by exploring various preprocessing, feature extraction, and machine-learning classifier combinations. Our methodology begins with an input dataset of lung X-ray images, which undergoes preprocessing steps such as image sharpening and histogram equalization to enhance image quality. Subsequently, feature extraction techniques, including Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG), and Local Binary Patterns (LBP), are applied to the pre-processed images. We evaluate the effectiveness of several machine learning classifiers—Naive Bayes (NB), K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—on both original and pre-processed images to determine the optimal classifier. Following the selection of the best-performing classifier, i.e., Logistic Regression, we further optimize the classification process by applying combinations of the feature extraction techniques (SIFT + HOG, SIFT + LBP, HOG + LBP, SIFT + HOG + LBP). The SIFT + HOG + LBP feature extraction, in combination with Logistic Regression, performed the best on the original images, obtaining an accuracy of 97.12 %, precision of 97.97 %, recall of 97.55 %, and F1-score of 97.76 %. Our study presents the comparative performance of each preprocessing and feature extraction technique, both individually and in combination, in bringing about an improvement in the accuracy of lung disease detection. The study concludes with the identification of the most effective preprocessing and feature extraction combination, coupled with the best machine learning classifier, providing a robust framework for enhanced lung disease diagnosis.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Informatics Journal
Egyptian Informatics Journal Decision Sciences-Management Science and Operations Research
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
59
审稿时长
110 days
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Informatics Journal is published by the Faculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Cairo University. This Journal provides a forum for the state-of-the-art research and development in the fields of computing, including computer sciences, information technologies, information systems, operations research and decision support. Innovative and not-previously-published work in subjects covered by the Journal is encouraged to be submitted, whether from academic, research or commercial sources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信