{"title":"Identifying Nutritional Inequities of Patients with Cancer Residing in Food Deserts","authors":"Lara LePore BS , Dahlia Kronfli MD , Kaysee Baker MS , Caitlin Eggleston BS , Kaitlin Schotz RD, LDN, CSO , Amber S. Kleckner PhD , Søren M. Bentzen PhD, DMSc, FASTRO , Pranshu Mohindra MD, MBBS , Melissa A.L. Vyfhuis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Nutrition is essential for cancer care, and patients who reside in food priority areas (FPAs) may experience limited access to healthy meals. There are few data evaluating the consequence of residing in FPAs because it relates to perceived food insecurity, psychosocial needs, or nutritional status of patients with cancer. This study aimed to determine the nutritional and psychosocial needs of patients with cancer who do and do not reside in FPAs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>From May 2019 to December 2022, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted using a validated questionnaire, offered at various time points before and after therapy, evaluating the psychosocial needs of patients with curable cancers. Groups were compared using X<sup>2</sup> and Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> tests as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of food insecurity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survey compliance was 74% (n = 320 of 434 patients). Patients who resided in FPAs (26%; n = 114) were more likely to self-identify as Black (60.5% vs 39.5%; <em>P</em> < .001), single (70% vs 37%; <em>P</em> < .001), and have a lower median income ($47,225 vs $91,305; <em>P</em> < .001) when compared with non-FPA residents. Residents of FPAs had a higher unmet nutritional needs index (median nutritional unmet needs score: 2.42 vs 2.00; <em>P</em> = .003), which included higher demands for healthier food choices (67.6% vs 54.4; <em>P</em> = .047) and greater food insecurity (44.4% vs 19.9%; <em>P</em> = .002). FPA residence was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of food insecurity (odds ratio [OR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-6.57; <em>P</em> < .001). On multivariate analysis, predictors for food insecurity included Black race (OR, 9.46; 95% CI, 3.93-22.76; <em>P</em> < .001), stage (stage IV vs l OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.12-16.34; <em>P</em> = .034), and recurrent disease (OR, 10.26; 95% CI, 2.29-46.09; <em>P</em> = .002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Inequities were identified in patients residing in FPAs, where race and higher stage were important predictors of food insecurity. Demographics can be readily used by clinicians to identify high-risk patients early in their cancer care in order to provide continuous nutritional resources to improve food insecurity perceptions. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm if such interventions improve cancer outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 101641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424002045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Nutrition is essential for cancer care, and patients who reside in food priority areas (FPAs) may experience limited access to healthy meals. There are few data evaluating the consequence of residing in FPAs because it relates to perceived food insecurity, psychosocial needs, or nutritional status of patients with cancer. This study aimed to determine the nutritional and psychosocial needs of patients with cancer who do and do not reside in FPAs.
Methods and Materials
From May 2019 to December 2022, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted using a validated questionnaire, offered at various time points before and after therapy, evaluating the psychosocial needs of patients with curable cancers. Groups were compared using X2 and Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of food insecurity.
Results
Survey compliance was 74% (n = 320 of 434 patients). Patients who resided in FPAs (26%; n = 114) were more likely to self-identify as Black (60.5% vs 39.5%; P < .001), single (70% vs 37%; P < .001), and have a lower median income ($47,225 vs $91,305; P < .001) when compared with non-FPA residents. Residents of FPAs had a higher unmet nutritional needs index (median nutritional unmet needs score: 2.42 vs 2.00; P = .003), which included higher demands for healthier food choices (67.6% vs 54.4; P = .047) and greater food insecurity (44.4% vs 19.9%; P = .002). FPA residence was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of food insecurity (odds ratio [OR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-6.57; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, predictors for food insecurity included Black race (OR, 9.46; 95% CI, 3.93-22.76; P < .001), stage (stage IV vs l OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.12-16.34; P = .034), and recurrent disease (OR, 10.26; 95% CI, 2.29-46.09; P = .002).
Conclusions
Inequities were identified in patients residing in FPAs, where race and higher stage were important predictors of food insecurity. Demographics can be readily used by clinicians to identify high-risk patients early in their cancer care in order to provide continuous nutritional resources to improve food insecurity perceptions. Future prospective studies are needed to confirm if such interventions improve cancer outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.