Comparing machine learning approaches for predicting the success of ICSI treatment: A study on clinical applications

Abrar Mohammad , Haneen Awad , Huthaifa I. Ashqar
{"title":"Comparing machine learning approaches for predicting the success of ICSI treatment: A study on clinical applications","authors":"Abrar Mohammad ,&nbsp;Haneen Awad ,&nbsp;Huthaifa I. Ashqar","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) is widely used to treat almost all forms of male infertility and to overcome fertilization failure. While ICSI is a powerful procedure, it's also considered quite expensive, which means couples and clinicians have to make informed decisions about whether or not to proceed with this treatment. About 10,036 patient records, 46 attribute sets, and one label column that indicates the success or failure of pregnancy after the ICSI treatment were used to conduct this research. The data were gathered from Razan infertility center in Palestine. The ICSI dataset contains only clinical features that are known prior to deciding on ICSI treatment. The dataset contains 46 features, 5 of the independent features have categorical values, 12 are numerical, 3 are string, and 26 are binary. Based on the results, RF algorithm achieved the highest AUC score of 0.97, followed by the NN with a score of 0.95, and the RIMARC algorithm with a score of 0.92. AUC is a widely used metric for evaluating the performance of binary classification models. Therefore, judging by the AUC scores, it appears that RF algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms in terms of the evaluated metric. The method employed in our analysis demonstrates considerable promise, practicality, and generalizability, driving advancements in fertility treatments and ultimately improving the chances of couples achieving their desired family goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) is widely used to treat almost all forms of male infertility and to overcome fertilization failure. While ICSI is a powerful procedure, it's also considered quite expensive, which means couples and clinicians have to make informed decisions about whether or not to proceed with this treatment. About 10,036 patient records, 46 attribute sets, and one label column that indicates the success or failure of pregnancy after the ICSI treatment were used to conduct this research. The data were gathered from Razan infertility center in Palestine. The ICSI dataset contains only clinical features that are known prior to deciding on ICSI treatment. The dataset contains 46 features, 5 of the independent features have categorical values, 12 are numerical, 3 are string, and 26 are binary. Based on the results, RF algorithm achieved the highest AUC score of 0.97, followed by the NN with a score of 0.95, and the RIMARC algorithm with a score of 0.92. AUC is a widely used metric for evaluating the performance of binary classification models. Therefore, judging by the AUC scores, it appears that RF algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms in terms of the evaluated metric. The method employed in our analysis demonstrates considerable promise, practicality, and generalizability, driving advancements in fertility treatments and ultimately improving the chances of couples achieving their desired family goals.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信