Analyzing vehicle emissions using a hybrid machine learning approach using weighted average based k-means clustering for sustainable transportation decision-making

Mohd Mobasshir , Praveen Pachauri , Pratibha Kumari , Faisal Khan , Azhar Equbal , Osama Khan , Mohd Parvez , Taufique Ahamad , Shadab Ahmad
{"title":"Analyzing vehicle emissions using a hybrid machine learning approach using weighted average based k-means clustering for sustainable transportation decision-making","authors":"Mohd Mobasshir ,&nbsp;Praveen Pachauri ,&nbsp;Pratibha Kumari ,&nbsp;Faisal Khan ,&nbsp;Azhar Equbal ,&nbsp;Osama Khan ,&nbsp;Mohd Parvez ,&nbsp;Taufique Ahamad ,&nbsp;Shadab Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.grets.2024.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In today’s world, the heavy reliance on crude oil for transportation has significant environmental implications, contributing to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating global climate change and posing health risks. As environmental sustainability concerns grow, there is a need to explore alternative fuel options and vehicle technologies with reduced emissions. In this study, a comparative analysis is conducted on three distinct vehicle types — hybrid, diesel, and biodiesel — assessing their carbon footprint based on emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NOx, SO<sub>2</sub>, PM and UBHC across various operating conditions such as load, efficiency losses, and torque. The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was used to determine the weights for various output parameters, including, the weights assigned to these parameters are as follows: CO<sub>2</sub> emissions-13.76%, CO emissions-18.29%, UBHC emissions-25.58%, NOx emissions-13.54%, PM emissions-7.01%, and SO<sub>2</sub> emissions-21.83%. Various vehicle types were ranked using the Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) approach. The experimental findings show that, out of the three vehicle types, hybrid vehicles had the best emissions profile, with lower levels of all assessed pollutants. Consequently, hybrid vehicles are identified as having the lowest carbon footprint, followed by diesel vehicles, with biodiesel vehicles exhibiting the highest emissions. K-means clustering is used to determine which type of vehicle is most effective at reducing emissions. With emissions of 95 g/km, 0.2 g/km, 0.015 g/km, 0.02 g/km, 0.001 g/km, and 0.005 g/km for CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, UBHC, PM, and SO<sub>2</sub>, the hybrid car in cluster 1 yields the most promising results. This study underscores the importance of considering environmental impacts in vehicle selection and highlights the potential of hybrid technology in mitigating carbon emissions, highlighted by an insightful K-means clustering study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100598,"journal":{"name":"Green Technologies and Sustainability","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Technologies and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949736124000903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today’s world, the heavy reliance on crude oil for transportation has significant environmental implications, contributing to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating global climate change and posing health risks. As environmental sustainability concerns grow, there is a need to explore alternative fuel options and vehicle technologies with reduced emissions. In this study, a comparative analysis is conducted on three distinct vehicle types — hybrid, diesel, and biodiesel — assessing their carbon footprint based on emissions of CO2, CO, NOx, SO2, PM and UBHC across various operating conditions such as load, efficiency losses, and torque. The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was used to determine the weights for various output parameters, including, the weights assigned to these parameters are as follows: CO2 emissions-13.76%, CO emissions-18.29%, UBHC emissions-25.58%, NOx emissions-13.54%, PM emissions-7.01%, and SO2 emissions-21.83%. Various vehicle types were ranked using the Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) approach. The experimental findings show that, out of the three vehicle types, hybrid vehicles had the best emissions profile, with lower levels of all assessed pollutants. Consequently, hybrid vehicles are identified as having the lowest carbon footprint, followed by diesel vehicles, with biodiesel vehicles exhibiting the highest emissions. K-means clustering is used to determine which type of vehicle is most effective at reducing emissions. With emissions of 95 g/km, 0.2 g/km, 0.015 g/km, 0.02 g/km, 0.001 g/km, and 0.005 g/km for CO2, CO, UBHC, PM, and SO2, the hybrid car in cluster 1 yields the most promising results. This study underscores the importance of considering environmental impacts in vehicle selection and highlights the potential of hybrid technology in mitigating carbon emissions, highlighted by an insightful K-means clustering study.
使用基于加权平均的k-means聚类的混合机器学习方法分析车辆排放,用于可持续交通决策
在当今世界,运输对原油的严重依赖对环境产生了重大影响,造成了空气污染和温室气体排放,加剧了全球气候变化,并构成健康风险。随着对环境可持续性的关注日益增加,有必要探索可替代燃料的选择和减少排放的车辆技术。在这项研究中,对三种不同类型的汽车——混合动力、柴油和生物柴油——进行了比较分析,根据二氧化碳、一氧化碳、氮氧化物、二氧化硫、PM和UBHC的排放,评估了它们在各种运行条件下(如负载、效率损失和扭矩)的碳足迹。采用层次分析法(AHP)确定各输出参数的权重,其中CO2排放量为13.76%,CO排放量为18.29%,UBHC排放量为25.58%,NOx排放量为13.54%,PM排放量为7.01%,SO2排放量为21.83%。使用基于平均解决方案距离的评估(EDAS)方法对各种车型进行排名。实验结果表明,在三种汽车类型中,混合动力汽车的排放情况最好,所有评估污染物的水平都较低。因此,混合动力汽车被认为是碳足迹最低的,其次是柴油汽车,而生物柴油汽车的排放量最高。k均值聚类用于确定哪种类型的车辆在减少排放方面最有效。CO2、CO、UBHC、PM和SO2的排放量分别为95 g/km、0.2 g/km、0.015 g/km、0.02 g/km、0.001 g/km和0.005 g/km,在第1组中混合动力汽车的结果最有希望。这项研究强调了在选择车辆时考虑环境影响的重要性,并强调了混合动力技术在减少碳排放方面的潜力,这一点通过一项富有洞察力的k均值聚类研究得到了强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信