The impact of targeted therapies on molecular alterations identified by an institutional molecular tumor board: an approach based on ESCAT classification

K. Rahmani Narj Abadi , C. Dupain , I. Guillou , R. Sanchez , K. Nedara , G. Marret , S. Hescot , M-P. Sablin , Z. Castel-Ajgal , C. Neuzillet , E. Borcoman , D. Bello Roufai , M. Rodrigues , A. Asnacios Lecerf , C. Callens , O. Trabelsi-Grati , S. Melaabi , K. Driouch , S. Antonio , E. Lemaitre , C. Le Tourneau
{"title":"The impact of targeted therapies on molecular alterations identified by an institutional molecular tumor board: an approach based on ESCAT classification","authors":"K. Rahmani Narj Abadi ,&nbsp;C. Dupain ,&nbsp;I. Guillou ,&nbsp;R. Sanchez ,&nbsp;K. Nedara ,&nbsp;G. Marret ,&nbsp;S. Hescot ,&nbsp;M-P. Sablin ,&nbsp;Z. Castel-Ajgal ,&nbsp;C. Neuzillet ,&nbsp;E. Borcoman ,&nbsp;D. Bello Roufai ,&nbsp;M. Rodrigues ,&nbsp;A. Asnacios Lecerf ,&nbsp;C. Callens ,&nbsp;O. Trabelsi-Grati ,&nbsp;S. Melaabi ,&nbsp;K. Driouch ,&nbsp;S. Antonio ,&nbsp;E. Lemaitre ,&nbsp;C. Le Tourneau","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The European Society of Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) classification system provides a standardized framework for categorizing genomic alterations (GAs) of patients with recurrent, metastatic, or rare cancer. This study aimed to present outcomes of patients discussed at the molecular tumor board (MTB) in general and according to ESCAT.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We included 1226 patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cancer presented at the MTB from 2018 to 2022. Clinical and demographic data collected included age, gender, type of specimen, tumor type, number of prior treatments received, techniques used for molecular analyses, GAs identified, MTB recommendations, and inclusion or not into a clinical trial. The clinical endpoints collected were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and were correlated with ESCAT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Successful molecular profiling was carried out in 895 of 1226 (73%) patients. Actionable GAs were found in 595 (49%) patients, and 206 (17%) patients were oriented to matched therapies. Eventually, 101 (8%) patients received a matched therapy. For these patients, PFS and OS were significantly longer for GAs classified as ESCAT tiers I/II, compared with tiers III/IV (<em>P</em> = 0.009 and <em>P</em> = 0.014, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Detection of actionable GAs through MTB molecular screening enabled to treat 8% of patients with matched therapy. Patients treated with matched therapy based on ESCAT tiers I/II had statistically longer PFS and OS, compared with ESCAT tiers III/IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The European Society of Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) classification system provides a standardized framework for categorizing genomic alterations (GAs) of patients with recurrent, metastatic, or rare cancer. This study aimed to present outcomes of patients discussed at the molecular tumor board (MTB) in general and according to ESCAT.

Patients and methods

We included 1226 patients with recurrent and/or metastatic cancer presented at the MTB from 2018 to 2022. Clinical and demographic data collected included age, gender, type of specimen, tumor type, number of prior treatments received, techniques used for molecular analyses, GAs identified, MTB recommendations, and inclusion or not into a clinical trial. The clinical endpoints collected were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and were correlated with ESCAT.

Results

Successful molecular profiling was carried out in 895 of 1226 (73%) patients. Actionable GAs were found in 595 (49%) patients, and 206 (17%) patients were oriented to matched therapies. Eventually, 101 (8%) patients received a matched therapy. For these patients, PFS and OS were significantly longer for GAs classified as ESCAT tiers I/II, compared with tiers III/IV (P = 0.009 and P = 0.014, respectively).

Conclusions

Detection of actionable GAs through MTB molecular screening enabled to treat 8% of patients with matched therapy. Patients treated with matched therapy based on ESCAT tiers I/II had statistically longer PFS and OS, compared with ESCAT tiers III/IV.
由机构分子肿瘤委员会确定的靶向治疗对分子改变的影响:基于ESCAT分类的方法
欧洲肿瘤医学学会分子靶点临床可操作性量表(ESCAT)分类系统为复发、转移或罕见癌症患者的基因组改变(GAs)分类提供了一个标准化框架。本研究旨在介绍在分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)上讨论的患者的总体结果,并根据ESCAT。患者和方法我们纳入了2018年至2022年期间在MTB就诊的1226例复发和/或转移性癌症患者。收集的临床和人口统计数据包括年龄、性别、标本类型、肿瘤类型、先前接受治疗的次数、用于分子分析的技术、确定的气体、MTB建议以及是否纳入临床试验。收集的临床终点为总缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并与ESCAT相关。结果1226例患者中有895例(73%)成功进行了分子谱分析。在595例(49%)患者中发现了可操作的GAs, 206例(17%)患者面向匹配治疗。最终,101例(8%)患者接受了匹配治疗。对于这些患者,ESCAT I/II级GAs的PFS和OS明显长于III/IV级(P = 0.009和P = 0.014)。结论通过MTB分子筛选检测出可操作的GAs,使8%的患者得到匹配治疗。与ESCAT III/IV级相比,接受ESCAT I/II级匹配治疗的患者的PFS和OS在统计学上更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信