How did internet information influence COVID-19 vaccination? The cyclical influence of the internet information, beliefs, attitudes, and intentions toward vaccines from a three-wave longitudinal study

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Sanae Inoue , Kei Fuji
{"title":"How did internet information influence COVID-19 vaccination? The cyclical influence of the internet information, beliefs, attitudes, and intentions toward vaccines from a three-wave longitudinal study","authors":"Sanae Inoue ,&nbsp;Kei Fuji","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the psychological processes leading to the formation of COVID-19 vaccination in Japan, a country with strong vaccine hesitancy, using integrative health behavior theory. We conducted a three-wave longitudinal study of 990 Japanese adults to investigate what information on the internet cyclically influences vaccination attitudes and intentions. The results showed that the psychological process that leads to the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine can be explained by applying integrative health behavior theory. However, while susceptibility to and fear of infection significantly influenced vaccination intention at the beginning of the pandemic, only the severity of the disease was significant at Time 3, indicating that the factors that promote vaccination intention can change over time. Nevertheless, subjective norms and self-efficacy were consistently associated with COVID-19 vaccination intentions and beliefs throughout the entire period. Furthermore, although information obtained from the internet influences vaccination intention, this influence varies depending on the content. In particular, information on the availability of vaccines increases vaccination intentions, and vaccination intentions facilitate the viewing of information in the next wave, indicating that information gathering on the internet and vaccine attitudes have a cyclical influence. Although expert information reduced self-efficacy and community benefits in the first wave, this effect decreased over time. The findings provide practical insight into how to increase vaccination intentions in the context of information confusion before and after vaccination programs are launched.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102776"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24003245","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the psychological processes leading to the formation of COVID-19 vaccination in Japan, a country with strong vaccine hesitancy, using integrative health behavior theory. We conducted a three-wave longitudinal study of 990 Japanese adults to investigate what information on the internet cyclically influences vaccination attitudes and intentions. The results showed that the psychological process that leads to the acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine can be explained by applying integrative health behavior theory. However, while susceptibility to and fear of infection significantly influenced vaccination intention at the beginning of the pandemic, only the severity of the disease was significant at Time 3, indicating that the factors that promote vaccination intention can change over time. Nevertheless, subjective norms and self-efficacy were consistently associated with COVID-19 vaccination intentions and beliefs throughout the entire period. Furthermore, although information obtained from the internet influences vaccination intention, this influence varies depending on the content. In particular, information on the availability of vaccines increases vaccination intentions, and vaccination intentions facilitate the viewing of information in the next wave, indicating that information gathering on the internet and vaccine attitudes have a cyclical influence. Although expert information reduced self-efficacy and community benefits in the first wave, this effect decreased over time. The findings provide practical insight into how to increase vaccination intentions in the context of information confusion before and after vaccination programs are launched.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信