Understanding sociodemographic differences in climate behavior, climate policy acceptance, and political participation

Lena Lehrer , Lennart Hellmann , Cornelia Betsch
{"title":"Understanding sociodemographic differences in climate behavior, climate policy acceptance, and political participation","authors":"Lena Lehrer ,&nbsp;Lennart Hellmann ,&nbsp;Cornelia Betsch","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To mitigate the global health threat posed by climate change, multifaceted responses are required. In previous work, older, male, and highly educated individuals were shown to exhibit greater general readiness to act against climate change; the same is true for people living in larger communities. Yet, the sociodemographic effects may vary for the single facets of the readiness to act against climate change—namely individual climate-friendly behavior, acceptance of climate-protection policies, and political participation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from four waves (2022–2023) of the Planetary Health Action Survey (PACE) were analyzed (<em>N</em> = 3,830, nonprobabilistic representative German sample). Sociodemographic variables (gender, age, community size, education and others) and the three abovementioned facets of the readiness to act against climate change were assessed to examine their relationships.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patterns varied between the indicators. Women and older individuals exhibited more climate-friendly behavior and policy acceptance. In contrast, levels of political participation were higher for men and younger individuals. Higher education was linked to less sustainable behavior, greater policy acceptance, and higher participation, while municipality size was only linked to the latter two. Additional analyses explore the relations between age and the constructs at item level.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Findings underscore the importance of a nuanced understanding of people's readiness to act against climate change. Depending on communication objectives, different target groups may be relevant, e.g., do campaigners want to increase political participation vs. change individual behaviors. While older individuals exhibit greater readiness to act via individual behavior and policy acceptance, it is important to include young people in climate-communication efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

To mitigate the global health threat posed by climate change, multifaceted responses are required. In previous work, older, male, and highly educated individuals were shown to exhibit greater general readiness to act against climate change; the same is true for people living in larger communities. Yet, the sociodemographic effects may vary for the single facets of the readiness to act against climate change—namely individual climate-friendly behavior, acceptance of climate-protection policies, and political participation.

Methods

Data from four waves (2022–2023) of the Planetary Health Action Survey (PACE) were analyzed (N = 3,830, nonprobabilistic representative German sample). Sociodemographic variables (gender, age, community size, education and others) and the three abovementioned facets of the readiness to act against climate change were assessed to examine their relationships.

Results

Patterns varied between the indicators. Women and older individuals exhibited more climate-friendly behavior and policy acceptance. In contrast, levels of political participation were higher for men and younger individuals. Higher education was linked to less sustainable behavior, greater policy acceptance, and higher participation, while municipality size was only linked to the latter two. Additional analyses explore the relations between age and the constructs at item level.

Conclusions

Findings underscore the importance of a nuanced understanding of people's readiness to act against climate change. Depending on communication objectives, different target groups may be relevant, e.g., do campaigners want to increase political participation vs. change individual behaviors. While older individuals exhibit greater readiness to act via individual behavior and policy acceptance, it is important to include young people in climate-communication efforts.
了解气候行为、气候政策接受度和政治参与方面的社会人口差异
为减轻气候变化对全球健康造成的威胁,需要采取多方面的应对措施。在之前的研究中,年龄较大、男性和受过高等教育的人普遍表现出更大的应对气候变化的意愿;生活在较大社区的人也是如此。然而,在应对气候变化的行动准备的单一方面,即个人气候友好行为、对气候保护政策的接受和政治参与,其社会人口效应可能会有所不同。方法分析行星健康行动调查(PACE) 2022-2023年四波数据(N = 3,830,非概率代表性德国样本)。对社会人口变量(性别、年龄、社区规模、教育程度等)和上述三个应对气候变化的准备程度进行了评估,以审查它们之间的关系。结果各指标之间存在差异。女性和老年人表现出更多的气候友好行为和政策接受度。相比之下,男性和年轻人的政治参与程度更高。高等教育与不太可持续的行为、更大的政策接受度和更高的参与度有关,而市政规模只与后两者有关。另外的分析在项目水平上探讨了年龄和构念之间的关系。研究结果强调了细致入微地了解人们应对气候变化的准备程度的重要性。根据传播目标,不同的目标群体可能是相关的,例如,竞选者是想增加政治参与还是想改变个人行为。虽然老年人通过个人行为和政策接受表现出更大的行动意愿,但将年轻人纳入气候沟通工作也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信