Somatic movement intervention among older adults to improve body awareness and spine mobility: A pilot study

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Diana K. Lara , Kate A. Hamel , David I. Anderson
{"title":"Somatic movement intervention among older adults to improve body awareness and spine mobility: A pilot study","authors":"Diana K. Lara ,&nbsp;Kate A. Hamel ,&nbsp;David I. Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.12.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loss of spine mobility is common among older adults and is linked to impairments in physical function, however there are few empirically-tested interventions to improve spinal mobility in this population. Somatic movement (SM) techniques aim to increase body and movement awareness and facilitate repatterning processes. A SM instructor guides participants to focus on inner sensations to improve and regulate breath, posture and movement efficiency and expression. We developed a SM intervention to improve spine and pelvis awareness and movement based on Body-Mind Centering®. The goals of this single arm mix-methods longitudinal intervention study were to: 1) asses the feasibility/acceptability of delivering a SM online program, 2) measure the effects of the SM intervention on mental imagery (MI), body/posture awareness, spine mobility, balance, 3) better understand participants’ integration of MI and spinal mobility through a qualitative approach, and 4) provide information that can be used for the design of a future randomized controlled trial. The SM intervention consisted of two weekly 1-h classes for 10-weeks. Fifteen older adults (14 female/1 male, age 72.6 ± 7.7 years) completed pre-intervention and fourteen completed the post-intervention on-line physical evaluations ((Back Performance Scale(BPS), spinal rotation, single limb stance, 360 turn, 30 s sit to stand tests) and self-administered questionnaires (body (MAIA-2) and posture (PAS) awareness and balance self-confidence (ABC) scales).</div><div>There was a significant improvement in spinal mobility as measured by the BPS -.86 ± .94 (<em>p</em> = .005). There were no improvements in body/posture awareness or balance confidence scores (<em>p</em> &gt; .05). However, baseline scores were inversely related with post-intervention scores for MAIA-2 subscales of noticing, not distracting and body listening, PAS scales, ABC scale, 360 turn test counterclockwise steps, 30 s sit to stand, and BPS-pick-up test (p &lt; .05). Qualitative findings support changes in visual MI of the spine from rigid to fluid images. Kinesthetic awareness was modified; more participants described positive sensations associated with the movement of their spine after the intervention. The study provides evidence for the positive effects of a 10-week SM intervention on spine mobility and its benefits on MI, body and postural awareness, especially in those with lower baseline performance and those who are less familiar with those concepts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 319-330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224005771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loss of spine mobility is common among older adults and is linked to impairments in physical function, however there are few empirically-tested interventions to improve spinal mobility in this population. Somatic movement (SM) techniques aim to increase body and movement awareness and facilitate repatterning processes. A SM instructor guides participants to focus on inner sensations to improve and regulate breath, posture and movement efficiency and expression. We developed a SM intervention to improve spine and pelvis awareness and movement based on Body-Mind Centering®. The goals of this single arm mix-methods longitudinal intervention study were to: 1) asses the feasibility/acceptability of delivering a SM online program, 2) measure the effects of the SM intervention on mental imagery (MI), body/posture awareness, spine mobility, balance, 3) better understand participants’ integration of MI and spinal mobility through a qualitative approach, and 4) provide information that can be used for the design of a future randomized controlled trial. The SM intervention consisted of two weekly 1-h classes for 10-weeks. Fifteen older adults (14 female/1 male, age 72.6 ± 7.7 years) completed pre-intervention and fourteen completed the post-intervention on-line physical evaluations ((Back Performance Scale(BPS), spinal rotation, single limb stance, 360 turn, 30 s sit to stand tests) and self-administered questionnaires (body (MAIA-2) and posture (PAS) awareness and balance self-confidence (ABC) scales).
There was a significant improvement in spinal mobility as measured by the BPS -.86 ± .94 (p = .005). There were no improvements in body/posture awareness or balance confidence scores (p > .05). However, baseline scores were inversely related with post-intervention scores for MAIA-2 subscales of noticing, not distracting and body listening, PAS scales, ABC scale, 360 turn test counterclockwise steps, 30 s sit to stand, and BPS-pick-up test (p < .05). Qualitative findings support changes in visual MI of the spine from rigid to fluid images. Kinesthetic awareness was modified; more participants described positive sensations associated with the movement of their spine after the intervention. The study provides evidence for the positive effects of a 10-week SM intervention on spine mobility and its benefits on MI, body and postural awareness, especially in those with lower baseline performance and those who are less familiar with those concepts.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信