The immediate effects of myofascial release on lumbar range of motion and flexibility in healthy individuals: A double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Mark Gugliotti , Alex Rothstein , Ellior Badash , Randy Cruz , Cailey Cummings , Brian Karafa , Taylor Santiago
{"title":"The immediate effects of myofascial release on lumbar range of motion and flexibility in healthy individuals: A double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial","authors":"Mark Gugliotti ,&nbsp;Alex Rothstein ,&nbsp;Ellior Badash ,&nbsp;Randy Cruz ,&nbsp;Cailey Cummings ,&nbsp;Brian Karafa ,&nbsp;Taylor Santiago","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Myofascial release (MFR) is a manual therapy technique defined as a low load; long-duration stretch to the myofascial complex. Its application is intended to restore optimal length in fascial tissue, alleviate associated discomfort due to adverse tissue tension, increase range of motion, and improve flexibility. This randomized control trial (RCT) aimed to examine the immediate effects of myofascial release MFR on improving lumbar range of motion (ROM) and flexibility in healthy, young adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were randomized to an experimental group (EG) or a sham treatment group (CG). Baseline outcome measurements including lumbar flexion (LF), lumbar side-bending (LSB), hamstring flexibility using the active knee extension test (AKE) and the modified sit-reach-test (MSR) were taken before and immediately following interventions. The EG received myofascial release to the lumbar paraspinal muscles while the CG received non-therapeutic hand contact to the same area.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between-groups differences revealed no statistically significant improvements. Within-group differences revealed statistically significant improvements for both groups. The EG showed improvements in LSB (R) (p = 0.02), AKE (L) (p &lt; 0.001), AKE (R) (p = 0.004), and MSR (p = 0.001). The CG showed improvements in LF (p = 0.03), LSB (L) (p = 0.09), LSB (R) (p = 0.03), AKE (L) (p = 0.004), AKE (R) (p &lt; 0.001), and MSR (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this RCT suggest MFR provided no greater benefit to improving lumbar ROM and flexibility in healthy, young adults when compared to non-therapeutic light touch. Future RCTs may consider examining a similar impact on individuals with persistent back pain who experience mobility and flexibility loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 645-650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922500052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Myofascial release (MFR) is a manual therapy technique defined as a low load; long-duration stretch to the myofascial complex. Its application is intended to restore optimal length in fascial tissue, alleviate associated discomfort due to adverse tissue tension, increase range of motion, and improve flexibility. This randomized control trial (RCT) aimed to examine the immediate effects of myofascial release MFR on improving lumbar range of motion (ROM) and flexibility in healthy, young adults.

Methods

Participants were randomized to an experimental group (EG) or a sham treatment group (CG). Baseline outcome measurements including lumbar flexion (LF), lumbar side-bending (LSB), hamstring flexibility using the active knee extension test (AKE) and the modified sit-reach-test (MSR) were taken before and immediately following interventions. The EG received myofascial release to the lumbar paraspinal muscles while the CG received non-therapeutic hand contact to the same area.

Results

Between-groups differences revealed no statistically significant improvements. Within-group differences revealed statistically significant improvements for both groups. The EG showed improvements in LSB (R) (p = 0.02), AKE (L) (p < 0.001), AKE (R) (p = 0.004), and MSR (p = 0.001). The CG showed improvements in LF (p = 0.03), LSB (L) (p = 0.09), LSB (R) (p = 0.03), AKE (L) (p = 0.004), AKE (R) (p < 0.001), and MSR (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The findings of this RCT suggest MFR provided no greater benefit to improving lumbar ROM and flexibility in healthy, young adults when compared to non-therapeutic light touch. Future RCTs may consider examining a similar impact on individuals with persistent back pain who experience mobility and flexibility loss.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信