The immediate effects of myofascial release on lumbar range of motion and flexibility in healthy individuals: A double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial
Mark Gugliotti , Alex Rothstein , Ellior Badash , Randy Cruz , Cailey Cummings , Brian Karafa , Taylor Santiago
{"title":"The immediate effects of myofascial release on lumbar range of motion and flexibility in healthy individuals: A double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial","authors":"Mark Gugliotti , Alex Rothstein , Ellior Badash , Randy Cruz , Cailey Cummings , Brian Karafa , Taylor Santiago","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Myofascial release (MFR) is a manual therapy technique defined as a low load; long-duration stretch to the myofascial complex. Its application is intended to restore optimal length in fascial tissue, alleviate associated discomfort due to adverse tissue tension, increase range of motion, and improve flexibility. This randomized control trial (RCT) aimed to examine the immediate effects of myofascial release MFR on improving lumbar range of motion (ROM) and flexibility in healthy, young adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were randomized to an experimental group (EG) or a sham treatment group (CG). Baseline outcome measurements including lumbar flexion (LF), lumbar side-bending (LSB), hamstring flexibility using the active knee extension test (AKE) and the modified sit-reach-test (MSR) were taken before and immediately following interventions. The EG received myofascial release to the lumbar paraspinal muscles while the CG received non-therapeutic hand contact to the same area.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between-groups differences revealed no statistically significant improvements. Within-group differences revealed statistically significant improvements for both groups. The EG showed improvements in LSB (R) (p = 0.02), AKE (L) (p < 0.001), AKE (R) (p = 0.004), and MSR (p = 0.001). The CG showed improvements in LF (p = 0.03), LSB (L) (p = 0.09), LSB (R) (p = 0.03), AKE (L) (p = 0.004), AKE (R) (p < 0.001), and MSR (p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this RCT suggest MFR provided no greater benefit to improving lumbar ROM and flexibility in healthy, young adults when compared to non-therapeutic light touch. Future RCTs may consider examining a similar impact on individuals with persistent back pain who experience mobility and flexibility loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 645-650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922500052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Myofascial release (MFR) is a manual therapy technique defined as a low load; long-duration stretch to the myofascial complex. Its application is intended to restore optimal length in fascial tissue, alleviate associated discomfort due to adverse tissue tension, increase range of motion, and improve flexibility. This randomized control trial (RCT) aimed to examine the immediate effects of myofascial release MFR on improving lumbar range of motion (ROM) and flexibility in healthy, young adults.
Methods
Participants were randomized to an experimental group (EG) or a sham treatment group (CG). Baseline outcome measurements including lumbar flexion (LF), lumbar side-bending (LSB), hamstring flexibility using the active knee extension test (AKE) and the modified sit-reach-test (MSR) were taken before and immediately following interventions. The EG received myofascial release to the lumbar paraspinal muscles while the CG received non-therapeutic hand contact to the same area.
Results
Between-groups differences revealed no statistically significant improvements. Within-group differences revealed statistically significant improvements for both groups. The EG showed improvements in LSB (R) (p = 0.02), AKE (L) (p < 0.001), AKE (R) (p = 0.004), and MSR (p = 0.001). The CG showed improvements in LF (p = 0.03), LSB (L) (p = 0.09), LSB (R) (p = 0.03), AKE (L) (p = 0.004), AKE (R) (p < 0.001), and MSR (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The findings of this RCT suggest MFR provided no greater benefit to improving lumbar ROM and flexibility in healthy, young adults when compared to non-therapeutic light touch. Future RCTs may consider examining a similar impact on individuals with persistent back pain who experience mobility and flexibility loss.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina