Relationship between sit-to-stand movements and physical function in healthy older adults: Testing duration power and displacement velocities for A 30-second chair-rise test

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Niladri Kumar Mahato , Alexandria Davis
{"title":"Relationship between sit-to-stand movements and physical function in healthy older adults: Testing duration power and displacement velocities for A 30-second chair-rise test","authors":"Niladri Kumar Mahato ,&nbsp;Alexandria Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Standard assessment of physical function commonly involves evaluation of gait speed, balance, duration of repetitive sit-to-stand movements using the 5-times chair-rise test (CRT-5), and handgrip strength (HGS). However, reports involving longer versions of stand-alone sit-to-stand tests to evaluate functional fitness in older adults are hard to find in literature.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the strength of within-group relationships between duration, power and velocity using a 30-s chair-rise test (CRT-30) and physical performance, and to assess between-group differences in these relationships, in a large cohort of older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Study participants (n = 73; age-range: 28–93 years; females: 50 males: 23) performed a longer protocol (CRT-30) at maximum voluntary speed. Chair-rise power (CRP), sit-to-stand (concentric) and stand-to-sit (eccentric) velocities were measured during trials. Anthropometric, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and HGS data collected with CRT-30 variables were analyzed in participants divided into three subsets (&lt;50, 50–70 &amp; &gt;70 years).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between-group differences significantly varied between CRT-30 measurements. CRT-30 duration, power and velocities demonstrated strong within-group correlations with SPPB and HGS measures, especially in the &gt;70-year age-group (p &lt; 0.01). CRT-30 and physical performance variables also showed significant between-group differences, especially for the &gt;70 years age group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CRT variables such as duration, power, sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit velocities exhibit stronger relationships with markers of physical function, especially in older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224005746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Standard assessment of physical function commonly involves evaluation of gait speed, balance, duration of repetitive sit-to-stand movements using the 5-times chair-rise test (CRT-5), and handgrip strength (HGS). However, reports involving longer versions of stand-alone sit-to-stand tests to evaluate functional fitness in older adults are hard to find in literature.

Purpose

To investigate the strength of within-group relationships between duration, power and velocity using a 30-s chair-rise test (CRT-30) and physical performance, and to assess between-group differences in these relationships, in a large cohort of older adults.

Methods

Study participants (n = 73; age-range: 28–93 years; females: 50 males: 23) performed a longer protocol (CRT-30) at maximum voluntary speed. Chair-rise power (CRP), sit-to-stand (concentric) and stand-to-sit (eccentric) velocities were measured during trials. Anthropometric, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and HGS data collected with CRT-30 variables were analyzed in participants divided into three subsets (<50, 50–70 & >70 years).

Results

Between-group differences significantly varied between CRT-30 measurements. CRT-30 duration, power and velocities demonstrated strong within-group correlations with SPPB and HGS measures, especially in the >70-year age-group (p < 0.01). CRT-30 and physical performance variables also showed significant between-group differences, especially for the >70 years age group.

Conclusion

CRT variables such as duration, power, sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit velocities exhibit stronger relationships with markers of physical function, especially in older adults.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信