What happened to the driver? Implications of electrification, digitalization, and automation on truck and taxi drivers

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Jindan Gong , Maria Xylia , Claudia Strambo , Björn Nykvist , Sirin Celik
{"title":"What happened to the driver? Implications of electrification, digitalization, and automation on truck and taxi drivers","authors":"Jindan Gong ,&nbsp;Maria Xylia ,&nbsp;Claudia Strambo ,&nbsp;Björn Nykvist ,&nbsp;Sirin Celik","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electrification, digitalization and automation are three trends driving the low-carbon transition of the transport sector. For the transition to be just, it is essential to ensure that those affected by these trends view the changes they bring as acceptable and fair. Transport policy development, however, mostly remains expert-driven. To explore just transitions in the context of transport electrification, digitalization and automation, we use Sweden as a case to analyse how taxi and truck drivers perceive the implications of these trends on six aspects of their quality of working life: skill requirements, work organization, job security, identity, safety and health. We also explore how these perceptions vary across dimensions of age, gender and geography. We found several perceived challenges related to skill requirements and identity, though drivers also see the potential for the trends to improve their work environment, safety and performance. However, these potential benefits are not taken for granted. The perceived implications may also raise potential distributional, procedural and recognition injustices, for instance regarding costs of reskilling, drivers' autonomy and the recognition of drivers' knowledge. We conclude that the technologies can have both positive and negative implications, and it is rather institutional arrangements, social processes, and broader societal and industrial shifts that cause transport workers to question their future in this sector. Incorporating drivers' insights into decision-making can enhance the drivers’ quality of working life and wellbeing while preserving their dignity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102816"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrification, digitalization and automation are three trends driving the low-carbon transition of the transport sector. For the transition to be just, it is essential to ensure that those affected by these trends view the changes they bring as acceptable and fair. Transport policy development, however, mostly remains expert-driven. To explore just transitions in the context of transport electrification, digitalization and automation, we use Sweden as a case to analyse how taxi and truck drivers perceive the implications of these trends on six aspects of their quality of working life: skill requirements, work organization, job security, identity, safety and health. We also explore how these perceptions vary across dimensions of age, gender and geography. We found several perceived challenges related to skill requirements and identity, though drivers also see the potential for the trends to improve their work environment, safety and performance. However, these potential benefits are not taken for granted. The perceived implications may also raise potential distributional, procedural and recognition injustices, for instance regarding costs of reskilling, drivers' autonomy and the recognition of drivers' knowledge. We conclude that the technologies can have both positive and negative implications, and it is rather institutional arrangements, social processes, and broader societal and industrial shifts that cause transport workers to question their future in this sector. Incorporating drivers' insights into decision-making can enhance the drivers’ quality of working life and wellbeing while preserving their dignity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信