Digital privacy education: Customized interventions for U.S. older and younger adults in rural and urban settings

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Heba Aly , Yizhou Liu , Sushmita Khan , Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky , Kaileigh Byrne , Bart Knijnenburg
{"title":"Digital privacy education: Customized interventions for U.S. older and younger adults in rural and urban settings","authors":"Heba Aly ,&nbsp;Yizhou Liu ,&nbsp;Sushmita Khan ,&nbsp;Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky ,&nbsp;Kaileigh Byrne ,&nbsp;Bart Knijnenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital technology has become nearly ubiquitous as a social conduit, yet a digital divide persists between older and younger populations, particularly in privacy and security literacy. This challenge is amplified for rural older adults facing resource scarcity and isolation. Currently, most educational resources are tailored for younger generations, potentially overlooking older adults’ unique needs. Our study addresses this gap by developing and evaluating digital privacy education interventions tailored to older adults’ learning preferences and abilities.</div><div>The study aims to test the effectiveness and user experience of various educational modalities, including text instructions, interactive tutorials, videos, comics, chatbots, and infographics. We compare these modalities’ impact on privacy knowledge, perceived learning, and enjoyment. The study also examines how user characteristics like age, gender, rurality, motivation, trust, self-efficacy, and privacy concerns influence the effectiveness of different modalities.</div><div>Findings reveal distinct modality preferences between older and younger generations in the US population. Age and gender influence perceived learning and knowledge gain, while rurality and motivation impact enjoyment. Younger adults prefer videos, while older adults favor text, though both groups show preference for video and chatbot modalities. This study aims to ensure equitable digital privacy education for all, emphasizing older adults’ distinct needs and preferences. The findings contribute to reducing the ‘digital divide’ in digital privacy, fostering a more privacy-aware society, and informing the design of future educational interventions for diverse age groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102805"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24003531","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital technology has become nearly ubiquitous as a social conduit, yet a digital divide persists between older and younger populations, particularly in privacy and security literacy. This challenge is amplified for rural older adults facing resource scarcity and isolation. Currently, most educational resources are tailored for younger generations, potentially overlooking older adults’ unique needs. Our study addresses this gap by developing and evaluating digital privacy education interventions tailored to older adults’ learning preferences and abilities.
The study aims to test the effectiveness and user experience of various educational modalities, including text instructions, interactive tutorials, videos, comics, chatbots, and infographics. We compare these modalities’ impact on privacy knowledge, perceived learning, and enjoyment. The study also examines how user characteristics like age, gender, rurality, motivation, trust, self-efficacy, and privacy concerns influence the effectiveness of different modalities.
Findings reveal distinct modality preferences between older and younger generations in the US population. Age and gender influence perceived learning and knowledge gain, while rurality and motivation impact enjoyment. Younger adults prefer videos, while older adults favor text, though both groups show preference for video and chatbot modalities. This study aims to ensure equitable digital privacy education for all, emphasizing older adults’ distinct needs and preferences. The findings contribute to reducing the ‘digital divide’ in digital privacy, fostering a more privacy-aware society, and informing the design of future educational interventions for diverse age groups.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信