The impact of two different aerobic exercise intensities on cardiometabolic parameters in type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized trial

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Regiane Maria da Costa-Arruda , Cauê Padovani , Marilia Correia , Fernanda Consolim-Colombo , Shane Phillips , Raphael Ritti-Dias , Luciana Maria Malosá Sampaio
{"title":"The impact of two different aerobic exercise intensities on cardiometabolic parameters in type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized trial","authors":"Regiane Maria da Costa-Arruda ,&nbsp;Cauê Padovani ,&nbsp;Marilia Correia ,&nbsp;Fernanda Consolim-Colombo ,&nbsp;Shane Phillips ,&nbsp;Raphael Ritti-Dias ,&nbsp;Luciana Maria Malosá Sampaio","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.12.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Regular exercise significantly reduces cardiovascular risk and helps prevent primary and secondary cardiac events. However, the mechanisms through which exercise affects cardiovascular health remain unclear. This study investigates the acute effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MOD) on endothelial function and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The study aimed to compare the acute effects of a single session of HIIT and MOD on endothelial function, hemodynamic parameters, and blood glucose levels in T2D patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT).</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Conducted at the Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Fifty-seven sedentary patients with type 2 diabetes (39 women and 18 men) participated in the study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were randomly assigned to either HIIT (10 sprints of 30 s at 85–100% of maximum heart rate, with 1-min active pauses) or MOD (continuous exercise at 60–70% of maximum heart rate for 30 min). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (%FMD) and blood glucose levels were measured before and immediately after the sessions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>HIIT significantly increased %FMD (9.3 ± 5.3% vs 20.05 ± 9.3%, p &lt; 0.01) and reduced glucose levels (189 [106–335] mg/dL vs 149 [70–448] mg/dL, p &lt; 0.01). Although MOD also showed positive responses, HIIT yielded more pronounced improvements in endothelial function.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HIIT is more effective for cardiovascular protection than MOD, although both exercises improve glycemic control in T2D patients. Higher %FMD is associated with better physical capacity and heart rate recovery, indicating a favorable prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 153-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224005655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Regular exercise significantly reduces cardiovascular risk and helps prevent primary and secondary cardiac events. However, the mechanisms through which exercise affects cardiovascular health remain unclear. This study investigates the acute effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MOD) on endothelial function and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Objectives

The study aimed to compare the acute effects of a single session of HIIT and MOD on endothelial function, hemodynamic parameters, and blood glucose levels in T2D patients.

Design

This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Setting

Conducted at the Laboratory of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation.

Participants

Fifty-seven sedentary patients with type 2 diabetes (39 women and 18 men) participated in the study.

Methods

Participants were randomly assigned to either HIIT (10 sprints of 30 s at 85–100% of maximum heart rate, with 1-min active pauses) or MOD (continuous exercise at 60–70% of maximum heart rate for 30 min). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (%FMD) and blood glucose levels were measured before and immediately after the sessions.

Results

HIIT significantly increased %FMD (9.3 ± 5.3% vs 20.05 ± 9.3%, p < 0.01) and reduced glucose levels (189 [106–335] mg/dL vs 149 [70–448] mg/dL, p < 0.01). Although MOD also showed positive responses, HIIT yielded more pronounced improvements in endothelial function.

Conclusion

HIIT is more effective for cardiovascular protection than MOD, although both exercises improve glycemic control in T2D patients. Higher %FMD is associated with better physical capacity and heart rate recovery, indicating a favorable prognosis.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信