Generative AI and educational sustainability: Examining the role of knowledge management factors and AI attributes using a deep learning-based hybrid SEM-ANN approach

IF 4.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Noor Al-Qaysi , Mostafa Al-Emran , Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi , Zaher Mundher Yaseen , Moamin A. Mahmoud , Azhana Ahmad
{"title":"Generative AI and educational sustainability: Examining the role of knowledge management factors and AI attributes using a deep learning-based hybrid SEM-ANN approach","authors":"Noor Al-Qaysi ,&nbsp;Mostafa Al-Emran ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi ,&nbsp;Zaher Mundher Yaseen ,&nbsp;Moamin A. Mahmoud ,&nbsp;Azhana Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2024.103964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrating Generative AI into educational settings holds transformative potential by personalizing learning, enhancing accessibility, and reducing resource usage, thereby promoting educational sustainability. However, understanding the drivers influencing Generative AI use and its subsequent impact on educational sustainability is still in short supply. Therefore, we developed an integrated model of knowledge management (KM) factors and AI attributes to examine their impact on Generative AI use and its consequent effect on educational sustainability. The model was then evaluated using a deep learning-based hybrid SEM-ANN approach based on data collected from 464 students. The PLS-SEM findings supported the role of knowledge acquisition, knowledge application, perceived anthropomorphism, perceived animacy, and perceived intelligence in positively affecting Generative AI use. In contrast, knowledge sharing showed no notable effect. The findings also showed that using Generative AI significantly promotes educational sustainability. The ANN results indicated that perceived anthropomorphism is the most critical factor impacting Generative AI use, with a normalized importance of 91.10 %. Theoretically, the findings offer empirical evidence on how KM factors and AI attributes influence Generative AI use and its role in enhancing educational sustainability. Practically, this research provides implications for various stakeholders interested in applying Generative AI for educational purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50635,"journal":{"name":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 103964"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924001338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating Generative AI into educational settings holds transformative potential by personalizing learning, enhancing accessibility, and reducing resource usage, thereby promoting educational sustainability. However, understanding the drivers influencing Generative AI use and its subsequent impact on educational sustainability is still in short supply. Therefore, we developed an integrated model of knowledge management (KM) factors and AI attributes to examine their impact on Generative AI use and its consequent effect on educational sustainability. The model was then evaluated using a deep learning-based hybrid SEM-ANN approach based on data collected from 464 students. The PLS-SEM findings supported the role of knowledge acquisition, knowledge application, perceived anthropomorphism, perceived animacy, and perceived intelligence in positively affecting Generative AI use. In contrast, knowledge sharing showed no notable effect. The findings also showed that using Generative AI significantly promotes educational sustainability. The ANN results indicated that perceived anthropomorphism is the most critical factor impacting Generative AI use, with a normalized importance of 91.10 %. Theoretically, the findings offer empirical evidence on how KM factors and AI attributes influence Generative AI use and its role in enhancing educational sustainability. Practically, this research provides implications for various stakeholders interested in applying Generative AI for educational purposes.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Standards & Interfaces
Computer Standards & Interfaces 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The quality of software, well-defined interfaces (hardware and software), the process of digitalisation, and accepted standards in these fields are essential for building and exploiting complex computing, communication, multimedia and measuring systems. Standards can simplify the design and construction of individual hardware and software components and help to ensure satisfactory interworking. Computer Standards & Interfaces is an international journal dealing specifically with these topics. The journal • Provides information about activities and progress on the definition of computer standards, software quality, interfaces and methods, at national, European and international levels • Publishes critical comments on standards and standards activities • Disseminates user''s experiences and case studies in the application and exploitation of established or emerging standards, interfaces and methods • Offers a forum for discussion on actual projects, standards, interfaces and methods by recognised experts • Stimulates relevant research by providing a specialised refereed medium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信