A comprehensive evaluation of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for wind speed and power prediction

Haytham Elmousalami , Hadi Hesham Elmesalami , Mina Maxi , Ahmed Abdel Kader Mohamed Farid , Nehal Elshaboury
{"title":"A comprehensive evaluation of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for wind speed and power prediction","authors":"Haytham Elmousalami ,&nbsp;Hadi Hesham Elmesalami ,&nbsp;Mina Maxi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdel Kader Mohamed Farid ,&nbsp;Nehal Elshaboury","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate wind speed and power predictions are crucial for renewable wind energy applications. This study compares and evaluates twelve machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, including single and ensemble models across various time scales from 10 min to a day and a half ahead with a particular focus on ensemble prediction algorithms. Moreover, the study proposes a wind speed and power prediction system where the outcome of the wind speed prediction (WSP) model serves as input for the wind power prediction (WPP) model. Several evaluation metrics, such as mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean square error (MSE) were calculated to benchmark different model accuracies. For WSP, the extremely randomized trees, decision tree, and bagging ensemble algorithms demonstrated high accuracy across different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 3.4% to 9.2%, the MSE ranged from 0.17 to 1.15, and the adjusted coefficient of determination ranged from 94% to 99%. For WPP, bagging ensemble algorithms and extremely randomized trees were also effective for predicting different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 4.12% to 11.7% and the MSE ranged from 10945 to 2.4. Ensemble ML algorithms provide better and more accurate results than single ML algorithms. The extreme gradient boosting model showed relatively small computational time and memory according to computational cost. Moreover, this study conducted a sensitivity analysis where air pressure, wind vane, and humidity were the key predictors for WSP and WPP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate wind speed and power predictions are crucial for renewable wind energy applications. This study compares and evaluates twelve machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, including single and ensemble models across various time scales from 10 min to a day and a half ahead with a particular focus on ensemble prediction algorithms. Moreover, the study proposes a wind speed and power prediction system where the outcome of the wind speed prediction (WSP) model serves as input for the wind power prediction (WPP) model. Several evaluation metrics, such as mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean square error (MSE) were calculated to benchmark different model accuracies. For WSP, the extremely randomized trees, decision tree, and bagging ensemble algorithms demonstrated high accuracy across different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 3.4% to 9.2%, the MSE ranged from 0.17 to 1.15, and the adjusted coefficient of determination ranged from 94% to 99%. For WPP, bagging ensemble algorithms and extremely randomized trees were also effective for predicting different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 4.12% to 11.7% and the MSE ranged from 10945 to 2.4. Ensemble ML algorithms provide better and more accurate results than single ML algorithms. The extreme gradient boosting model showed relatively small computational time and memory according to computational cost. Moreover, this study conducted a sensitivity analysis where air pressure, wind vane, and humidity were the key predictors for WSP and WPP.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信