Filling query-type text inputs for Android applications via inner-app mining and GPT recommendation

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Heji Huang, Ju Qian, Deping Zhang
{"title":"Filling query-type text inputs for Android applications via inner-app mining and GPT recommendation","authors":"Heji Huang,&nbsp;Ju Qian,&nbsp;Deping Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2025.103266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>GUI testing often requires filling reasonable text inputs to activate specific GUI behaviors, which is particularly challenging for query-type inputs used to search contents. Existing techniques may generate input data inconsistent with the query semantic or semantically consistent but not aligned with the current query domain. These data often result in trivial empty searches and are hard to test the internal matching conditions in the query. No search results also affect the further exploration of GUI pages depending on the query. This paper presents MATI (<u>M</u>ining <u>A</u>pp to generate <u>T</u>ext <u>I</u>nput), a new test generation method designed to fill query-type input items in Android applications with an intent to activate non-empty query searches. The method is built on a novel idea that the data suitable to input to a query often already occur on the GUI. Instead of creating new data by algorithms or retrieving data from external sources like the existing methods, MATI does inner-app mining to obtain proper candidate data for query inputs in an app. It then recommends the candidate data best fitting a specific query in both the query semantic and domain for test inputting via a GPT model. In experiments on 25 applications, MATI achieved a 94.6% GUI passing rate for query-type inputs–32.4% higher than the leading baseline, QTypist, thanks to its more generated non-empty searches. Its higher passing rates also led to 9.7% increments in the Android Activity coverage achieved during testing when integrating these methods into an automated GUI testing process. Such results suggest that MATI might benefit the practical testing of Android applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49561,"journal":{"name":"Science of Computer Programming","volume":"242 ","pages":"Article 103266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Computer Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016764232500005X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

GUI testing often requires filling reasonable text inputs to activate specific GUI behaviors, which is particularly challenging for query-type inputs used to search contents. Existing techniques may generate input data inconsistent with the query semantic or semantically consistent but not aligned with the current query domain. These data often result in trivial empty searches and are hard to test the internal matching conditions in the query. No search results also affect the further exploration of GUI pages depending on the query. This paper presents MATI (Mining App to generate Text Input), a new test generation method designed to fill query-type input items in Android applications with an intent to activate non-empty query searches. The method is built on a novel idea that the data suitable to input to a query often already occur on the GUI. Instead of creating new data by algorithms or retrieving data from external sources like the existing methods, MATI does inner-app mining to obtain proper candidate data for query inputs in an app. It then recommends the candidate data best fitting a specific query in both the query semantic and domain for test inputting via a GPT model. In experiments on 25 applications, MATI achieved a 94.6% GUI passing rate for query-type inputs–32.4% higher than the leading baseline, QTypist, thanks to its more generated non-empty searches. Its higher passing rates also led to 9.7% increments in the Android Activity coverage achieved during testing when integrating these methods into an automated GUI testing process. Such results suggest that MATI might benefit the practical testing of Android applications.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of Computer Programming
Science of Computer Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Science of Computer Programming is dedicated to the distribution of research results in the areas of software systems development, use and maintenance, including the software aspects of hardware design. The journal has a wide scope ranging from the many facets of methodological foundations to the details of technical issues andthe aspects of industrial practice. The subjects of interest to SCP cover the entire spectrum of methods for the entire life cycle of software systems, including • Requirements, specification, design, validation, verification, coding, testing, maintenance, metrics and renovation of software; • Design, implementation and evaluation of programming languages; • Programming environments, development tools, visualisation and animation; • Management of the development process; • Human factors in software, software for social interaction, software for social computing; • Cyber physical systems, and software for the interaction between the physical and the machine; • Software aspects of infrastructure services, system administration, and network management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信