{"title":"Multi-view reject inference for semi-supervised credit scoring with consistency training and three-way decision","authors":"Haoxin Tang, Decui Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In credit scoring, reject inference based on semi-supervised learning has shown better performance compared to those based on statistical methods. However, the problem of inconsistent data distribution between accepted and rejected samples still exists during model training, which may violate the smoothness assumption of semi-supervised learning. Besides, multi-view learning has demonstrated its effectiveness, but its validity in reject inference still needs to be verified. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-view reject inference approach (MRIA) based on three-way decision and consistency training. Specifically, with the aid of three-way decision, we sift valuable rejected samples from the profitability and accuracy objects, which brings the rejected samples better approximate the smooth assumption of semi-supervised learning. Then, based on the above-mentioned two objects, we construct multi-views by utilizing feature selection and train the reject inference model using consistency training, which can enhance the reliability and robustness. Finally, a dynamic fusion method built on the distance to model (DM) is employed for multi-view fusion. This paper not only theoretically demonstrates that high-quality data augmentation consistency training can result in a smaller error bound for the reject inference tasks, but also verifies the effectiveness of MRIA via a series of experimental analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103280"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In credit scoring, reject inference based on semi-supervised learning has shown better performance compared to those based on statistical methods. However, the problem of inconsistent data distribution between accepted and rejected samples still exists during model training, which may violate the smoothness assumption of semi-supervised learning. Besides, multi-view learning has demonstrated its effectiveness, but its validity in reject inference still needs to be verified. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-view reject inference approach (MRIA) based on three-way decision and consistency training. Specifically, with the aid of three-way decision, we sift valuable rejected samples from the profitability and accuracy objects, which brings the rejected samples better approximate the smooth assumption of semi-supervised learning. Then, based on the above-mentioned two objects, we construct multi-views by utilizing feature selection and train the reject inference model using consistency training, which can enhance the reliability and robustness. Finally, a dynamic fusion method built on the distance to model (DM) is employed for multi-view fusion. This paper not only theoretically demonstrates that high-quality data augmentation consistency training can result in a smaller error bound for the reject inference tasks, but also verifies the effectiveness of MRIA via a series of experimental analysis.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.