{"title":"A method to identify a representation of the set of non-dominated points for discrete tri-objective optimization problems","authors":"Sunney Fotedar, Ann-Brith Strömberg","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2024.106928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Solving a discrete tri-objective optimization problem involves generating a set of non-dominated points. Most generation methods aim to identify all the non-dominated points to understand the trade-off between conflicting objectives. Finding all the non-dominated points is computationally demanding, which may discourage decision-makers from using generation methods that identify all the non-dominated points. Therefore, it is beneficial to identify a good representation of the Pareto front. In this work, we present an algorithm for computing a representation of the Pareto front for discrete tri-objective optimization problems for a user-defined coverage gap. Further, we present a parallelization approach to decompose the criterion space while avoiding redundancies. We present <em>constrained coverage gap</em> to measure performance of algorithms when the problems have incommensurable objective functions. Our algorithm is computationally compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms <em>Grid point based algorithm</em> (GPBA-A; Mesquita-Cunha et al., (2023) and <em>Territory-defining algorithm</em> (TDA; Ceyhan et al., (2019)). While our primary motivation comes from industrial applications of the generalized tri-objective tactical resource allocation problem (GTRAP; Fotedar et al., (2023)), we have also performed tests on standard benchmark instances of the multi-dimensional tri-objective knapsack problem (3KP) to further validate our approach. Out of 300 instances of 3KP, our proposed algorithm performs best (computationally) in 264 instances. For GTRAP, our algorithm is computationally superior in all the instances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10542,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Operations Research","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 106928"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054824004003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Solving a discrete tri-objective optimization problem involves generating a set of non-dominated points. Most generation methods aim to identify all the non-dominated points to understand the trade-off between conflicting objectives. Finding all the non-dominated points is computationally demanding, which may discourage decision-makers from using generation methods that identify all the non-dominated points. Therefore, it is beneficial to identify a good representation of the Pareto front. In this work, we present an algorithm for computing a representation of the Pareto front for discrete tri-objective optimization problems for a user-defined coverage gap. Further, we present a parallelization approach to decompose the criterion space while avoiding redundancies. We present constrained coverage gap to measure performance of algorithms when the problems have incommensurable objective functions. Our algorithm is computationally compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms Grid point based algorithm (GPBA-A; Mesquita-Cunha et al., (2023) and Territory-defining algorithm (TDA; Ceyhan et al., (2019)). While our primary motivation comes from industrial applications of the generalized tri-objective tactical resource allocation problem (GTRAP; Fotedar et al., (2023)), we have also performed tests on standard benchmark instances of the multi-dimensional tri-objective knapsack problem (3KP) to further validate our approach. Out of 300 instances of 3KP, our proposed algorithm performs best (computationally) in 264 instances. For GTRAP, our algorithm is computationally superior in all the instances.
期刊介绍:
Operations research and computers meet in a large number of scientific fields, many of which are of vital current concern to our troubled society. These include, among others, ecology, transportation, safety, reliability, urban planning, economics, inventory control, investment strategy and logistics (including reverse logistics). Computers & Operations Research provides an international forum for the application of computers and operations research techniques to problems in these and related fields.