Digital transformation and rural healthcare disparities: A mixed-methods approach in India

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Yashoda Devi , Nitin Koshta , Sastry Sarath Pendyala
{"title":"Digital transformation and rural healthcare disparities: A mixed-methods approach in India","authors":"Yashoda Devi ,&nbsp;Nitin Koshta ,&nbsp;Sastry Sarath Pendyala","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Healthcare disparity is a major issue for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) faced by countries across the globe. It results in hardship for people living in rural areas who need healthcare services, ultimately impeding their right to health. A key digital transformation component, 'Telemedicine,' has the potential to reduce this healthcare disparity by offering virtual consultation, diagnosis, and treatment, thus leading to better healthcare access. However, research and practice on telemedicine adoption in rural healthcare systems (RHS) is nascent. The present study addresses this issue by examining the barriers to telemedicine adoption and mitigation strategies through a mixed-method study of India's RHS. In the first phase, the Grey Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Grey-DEMATEL) method is used, which identifies seventeen barriers that impede telemedicine adoption in RHS and unearths the causal relationship between them. In the second phase, a qualitative approach is used, which helps propose barrier mitigation strategies under three heads: <em>Patient Acceptance</em>, <em>Physician Buy-in</em>, and <em>Policy</em> Support, referred to as the \"3P framework\". A total of 10 strategies are proposed under this 3P framework to strengthen the RHS. The study results provide valuable insights to policymakers and decision-makers working towards healthcare digital transformation, UHC, and improving RHS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 103165"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224002153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare disparity is a major issue for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) faced by countries across the globe. It results in hardship for people living in rural areas who need healthcare services, ultimately impeding their right to health. A key digital transformation component, 'Telemedicine,' has the potential to reduce this healthcare disparity by offering virtual consultation, diagnosis, and treatment, thus leading to better healthcare access. However, research and practice on telemedicine adoption in rural healthcare systems (RHS) is nascent. The present study addresses this issue by examining the barriers to telemedicine adoption and mitigation strategies through a mixed-method study of India's RHS. In the first phase, the Grey Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Grey-DEMATEL) method is used, which identifies seventeen barriers that impede telemedicine adoption in RHS and unearths the causal relationship between them. In the second phase, a qualitative approach is used, which helps propose barrier mitigation strategies under three heads: Patient Acceptance, Physician Buy-in, and Policy Support, referred to as the "3P framework". A total of 10 strategies are proposed under this 3P framework to strengthen the RHS. The study results provide valuable insights to policymakers and decision-makers working towards healthcare digital transformation, UHC, and improving RHS.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信