Generating societal impact from collaborations between universities and arts and culture organisations (ACOs): Evidence from a survey of arts and culture professionals in the UK

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Federica Rossi , Ning Baines , Evelyn Wilson
{"title":"Generating societal impact from collaborations between universities and arts and culture organisations (ACOs): Evidence from a survey of arts and culture professionals in the UK","authors":"Federica Rossi ,&nbsp;Ning Baines ,&nbsp;Evelyn Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The art and cultural industries are known to generate not only important economic benefits, but also broader impacts on society. One of the ways in which they can amplify their societal impact is through their collaborations with universities, contributing to research and knowledge exchange activities that produce valuable outcomes for numerous societal stakeholders. Yet, the association between the characteristics of the collaboration and its impact is not clearly understood. Building on the framework of Collaborative Value Creation (CVC), we argue that the <em>nature</em> of the collaboration between university and ACO – whether it is transactional, integrative or transformational – will affect the <em>breadth</em> of impact generated – whether it benefits mainly the collaboration partners and/or external stakeholders. We rely on a unique, purpose-built survey of arts and culture professionals in the UK, co-designed by National Centre for Academic and Cultural Exchange (NCACE) and Arts Professional. The empirical findings confirm that different types of collaborations are associated with different breadth of impact: transactional collaborations mainly impact the ACO, integrative collaborations impact both partners, transformational collaborations impact external stakeholders. The impact on the ACO refers to direct benefit from the collaboration, rather than to the ACO's intention to engage in further collaborations; we find that the latter is negatively affected by the participation in transactional collaborations, and positively affected by the ACO's positive attitude towards collaborating. The study makes a theoretical contribution, by applying the CVC framework to a new context, and by identifying the mechanisms through which the nature of the collaboration influences the type of impact it produces. It also contributes to policy and practice by proposing a set of relevant implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 103158"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224002086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The art and cultural industries are known to generate not only important economic benefits, but also broader impacts on society. One of the ways in which they can amplify their societal impact is through their collaborations with universities, contributing to research and knowledge exchange activities that produce valuable outcomes for numerous societal stakeholders. Yet, the association between the characteristics of the collaboration and its impact is not clearly understood. Building on the framework of Collaborative Value Creation (CVC), we argue that the nature of the collaboration between university and ACO – whether it is transactional, integrative or transformational – will affect the breadth of impact generated – whether it benefits mainly the collaboration partners and/or external stakeholders. We rely on a unique, purpose-built survey of arts and culture professionals in the UK, co-designed by National Centre for Academic and Cultural Exchange (NCACE) and Arts Professional. The empirical findings confirm that different types of collaborations are associated with different breadth of impact: transactional collaborations mainly impact the ACO, integrative collaborations impact both partners, transformational collaborations impact external stakeholders. The impact on the ACO refers to direct benefit from the collaboration, rather than to the ACO's intention to engage in further collaborations; we find that the latter is negatively affected by the participation in transactional collaborations, and positively affected by the ACO's positive attitude towards collaborating. The study makes a theoretical contribution, by applying the CVC framework to a new context, and by identifying the mechanisms through which the nature of the collaboration influences the type of impact it produces. It also contributes to policy and practice by proposing a set of relevant implications.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信