Image-assisted seismic damage evaluation for reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Qisen Chen, Zecheng Yu, Bing Li
{"title":"Image-assisted seismic damage evaluation for reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints","authors":"Qisen Chen,&nbsp;Zecheng Yu,&nbsp;Bing Li","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seismic damage quantification for reinforced concrete (RC) interior beam-column joints is crucial for post-earthquake stability and safety assessment of existing RC buildings. Loading-induced cracks during earthquake excitation usually degrade structural strength, ductility, and stiffness, underscoring the importance of rational assessment for RC joints. In this study, an image-assisted seismic damage evaluation method for RC interior beam-column joints was suggested by incorporating image-assisted technology, feature selection techniques, and regression models. Three seismic damage evaluation indicators derived from drift ratio (<em>DID</em>), stiffness (<em>DIS</em>), and strength (<em>DIF</em>) were first introduced as the poor prognosis markers of RC damaged joints. Secondly, image-assisted feature extraction method was presented by pre-processing image to a consistent binary format, with textural and geometric attributes of surface crack patterns extracted as part of features for three evaluation tools. Next, hybrid-feature parameters by combing image features and structural parameters were jointly selected by combing MRMR algorithms and F-test. Lastly, seismic damage evaluations of RC joints were performed based on four machine learning models (e.g., Neural Network, Gaussian Process, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting) and 194 images from 37 available studies. Results indicate the highest accuracy for seismic damage derived from drift ratio can reach a robust R<sup>2</sup> of 0.83. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis of the proposed model further deepens the understanding of seismic damage recognition and provides insights into the intricate relationships between predictors and damage evaluation tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 108349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425001638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic damage quantification for reinforced concrete (RC) interior beam-column joints is crucial for post-earthquake stability and safety assessment of existing RC buildings. Loading-induced cracks during earthquake excitation usually degrade structural strength, ductility, and stiffness, underscoring the importance of rational assessment for RC joints. In this study, an image-assisted seismic damage evaluation method for RC interior beam-column joints was suggested by incorporating image-assisted technology, feature selection techniques, and regression models. Three seismic damage evaluation indicators derived from drift ratio (DID), stiffness (DIS), and strength (DIF) were first introduced as the poor prognosis markers of RC damaged joints. Secondly, image-assisted feature extraction method was presented by pre-processing image to a consistent binary format, with textural and geometric attributes of surface crack patterns extracted as part of features for three evaluation tools. Next, hybrid-feature parameters by combing image features and structural parameters were jointly selected by combing MRMR algorithms and F-test. Lastly, seismic damage evaluations of RC joints were performed based on four machine learning models (e.g., Neural Network, Gaussian Process, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting) and 194 images from 37 available studies. Results indicate the highest accuracy for seismic damage derived from drift ratio can reach a robust R2 of 0.83. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis of the proposed model further deepens the understanding of seismic damage recognition and provides insights into the intricate relationships between predictors and damage evaluation tools.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信