A robust diagnosis method specifically for similar faults in nuclear power plant multi-systems based on data segmentation and stacked convolutional autoencoders

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xin Ai, Yongkuo Liu, Longfei Shan, Jiarong Gao, Wanzhou Zhang
{"title":"A robust diagnosis method specifically for similar faults in nuclear power plant multi-systems based on data segmentation and stacked convolutional autoencoders","authors":"Xin Ai,&nbsp;Yongkuo Liu,&nbsp;Longfei Shan,&nbsp;Jiarong Gao,&nbsp;Wanzhou Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear power plants consist of multiple subsystems characterized by nonlinear correlations, numerous monitoring parameters, and faults with similar characteristics. These similar faults often exhibit closely distributed data points, resulting in unclear classification boundaries and reduced diagnostic accuracy for fault detection algorithms. A single deep learning model cannot establish a diagnostic model that is broad in scope, highly accurate, and robust. This paper proposes a robust, multi-system similar fault diagnosis model for nuclear power plants, combining K-Means and Stacked Convolutional Autoencoders (KSCAE). First, K-Means data segmentation model partitions complex multi-system fault data into several similar data clusters. Then, specialized diagnostic models are developed for each cluster using powerful stacked convolutional autoencoders to focus on learning and classifying similar faults. Testing across three nuclear power plant fault diagnosis scenarios based on data from the Fuqing nuclear power plant simulator demonstrates that KSCAE outperforms single deep learning models in diagnostic accuracy, particularly when fault severity differs between training and testing sets. The results show that the KSCAE algorithm achieves a maximum accuracy of 99.31% and a minimum accuracy of 79.11% under severe noise and data distribution differences. Compared to the baseline algorithms, KSCAE achieves an average accuracy improvement of up to approximately 20% across multiple tests, particularly in Scenario 2. This study demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed model for diagnosing similar faults, providing a reliable approach for multi-system fault diagnosis in nuclear power plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 111178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454924008417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nuclear power plants consist of multiple subsystems characterized by nonlinear correlations, numerous monitoring parameters, and faults with similar characteristics. These similar faults often exhibit closely distributed data points, resulting in unclear classification boundaries and reduced diagnostic accuracy for fault detection algorithms. A single deep learning model cannot establish a diagnostic model that is broad in scope, highly accurate, and robust. This paper proposes a robust, multi-system similar fault diagnosis model for nuclear power plants, combining K-Means and Stacked Convolutional Autoencoders (KSCAE). First, K-Means data segmentation model partitions complex multi-system fault data into several similar data clusters. Then, specialized diagnostic models are developed for each cluster using powerful stacked convolutional autoencoders to focus on learning and classifying similar faults. Testing across three nuclear power plant fault diagnosis scenarios based on data from the Fuqing nuclear power plant simulator demonstrates that KSCAE outperforms single deep learning models in diagnostic accuracy, particularly when fault severity differs between training and testing sets. The results show that the KSCAE algorithm achieves a maximum accuracy of 99.31% and a minimum accuracy of 79.11% under severe noise and data distribution differences. Compared to the baseline algorithms, KSCAE achieves an average accuracy improvement of up to approximately 20% across multiple tests, particularly in Scenario 2. This study demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed model for diagnosing similar faults, providing a reliable approach for multi-system fault diagnosis in nuclear power plants.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Annals of Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
21.10%
发文量
632
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信