Engineered testbeds for investigating syringe injection performance in human factors studies

Andrew Pack , Sabrina Su , Frank A. Drews , Amrish Chourasia , Kevin Cluff , Joy Guerrieri , Jungkyu Kim
{"title":"Engineered testbeds for investigating syringe injection performance in human factors studies","authors":"Andrew Pack ,&nbsp;Sabrina Su ,&nbsp;Frank A. Drews ,&nbsp;Amrish Chourasia ,&nbsp;Kevin Cluff ,&nbsp;Joy Guerrieri ,&nbsp;Jungkyu Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.hfh.2025.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to develop two injection testing systems to allow future work to measure the dynamic performance of injections using prefilled syringes across different fluid viscosities.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Subcutaneous (SC) injections, delivered into adipose tissue, are a convenient and cost-effective method of administering medications. However, administration via syringes can pose physical ergonomic challenges as the medication viscosity increases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To investigate the relationship between applied force and fluid viscosity, we constructed two testing systems: a passive system using prefilled syringes containing fluids of different viscosities and an active system that simulates different fluid viscosities by adjusting the cross-sectional area of a tube to modulate fluidic resistance. Both systems record the force exerted on the syringe plunger.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results from data collection using a syringe pump with solutions of 5, 10, 15, and 20 centipoise (cP) revealed a polynomial relationship between viscosity and force, contrary to the expected linear relationship. This unexpected pattern likely resulted from complex fluid dynamics in the 27-gauge needle. Testing of both systems confirmed that fluidic resistance control through viscosity and resistance effectively captured injection profiles. User testing further supported these findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The test systems provide valuable insights into the complex interplay between fluid viscosity, applied force, and syringe characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Application</h3><div>These findings can inform future syringe design, needle gauge selection, and help establish upper viscosity limits for SC injectable medications. The presented systems offer valuable tools for future Human Factors studies, enabling quantification of user strength during syringe injections across various groups, including those with hand impairments.</div></div><div><h3>Précis</h3><div>Two novel testing systems mimicking variable viscosity injections through fluidic or mechanical property variation enable the quantification of user strength in Human Factors studies and inform syringe design and viscosity limits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93564,"journal":{"name":"Human factors in healthcare","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human factors in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772501425000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to develop two injection testing systems to allow future work to measure the dynamic performance of injections using prefilled syringes across different fluid viscosities.

Background

Subcutaneous (SC) injections, delivered into adipose tissue, are a convenient and cost-effective method of administering medications. However, administration via syringes can pose physical ergonomic challenges as the medication viscosity increases.

Methods

To investigate the relationship between applied force and fluid viscosity, we constructed two testing systems: a passive system using prefilled syringes containing fluids of different viscosities and an active system that simulates different fluid viscosities by adjusting the cross-sectional area of a tube to modulate fluidic resistance. Both systems record the force exerted on the syringe plunger.

Results

Results from data collection using a syringe pump with solutions of 5, 10, 15, and 20 centipoise (cP) revealed a polynomial relationship between viscosity and force, contrary to the expected linear relationship. This unexpected pattern likely resulted from complex fluid dynamics in the 27-gauge needle. Testing of both systems confirmed that fluidic resistance control through viscosity and resistance effectively captured injection profiles. User testing further supported these findings.

Conclusion

The test systems provide valuable insights into the complex interplay between fluid viscosity, applied force, and syringe characteristics.

Application

These findings can inform future syringe design, needle gauge selection, and help establish upper viscosity limits for SC injectable medications. The presented systems offer valuable tools for future Human Factors studies, enabling quantification of user strength during syringe injections across various groups, including those with hand impairments.

Précis

Two novel testing systems mimicking variable viscosity injections through fluidic or mechanical property variation enable the quantification of user strength in Human Factors studies and inform syringe design and viscosity limits.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human factors in healthcare
Human factors in healthcare Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
145 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信