{"title":"Anaesthesia for open abdominal aortic surgery","authors":"Alastair Duncan, Adam Conrad Pichel","doi":"10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has declined in recent years and according to the annual National Vascular Registry reports (2019–23) the number of patients undergoing aneurysm repair has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 years. The UK has worked tirelessly to reduce its operative mortality rates for elective open AAA repair with the introduction of a quality improvement pro-gramme. Reducing death from ruptured aortic aneurysm has been the focus of the national screening programme. The short-term benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) when compared to open repair are well described, however, the long-term survival benefits, freedom form re-intervention and cost effectiveness of EVAR have been demonstrated to be dominated by open surgery. That is that people with intact AAA should be offered open surgery if medically suitable. The choice of technique for emergency AAA repair is less contentious, with the more traditional approach of open repair being rapidly overtaken by endovascular options in those who are anatomically suitable for EVAR. Technical analysis by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has consistently reported favourable outcomes with EVAR in the emergency setting and that it is a cost-effective treatment. In this article we provide an overview of the evidence supporting the different treatment options, outline current approaches to risk stratification, describe the key physiological changes that occur during open repair and describe an overview of the approach to perioperative management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45856,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 95-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472029924002480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has declined in recent years and according to the annual National Vascular Registry reports (2019–23) the number of patients undergoing aneurysm repair has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 years. The UK has worked tirelessly to reduce its operative mortality rates for elective open AAA repair with the introduction of a quality improvement pro-gramme. Reducing death from ruptured aortic aneurysm has been the focus of the national screening programme. The short-term benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) when compared to open repair are well described, however, the long-term survival benefits, freedom form re-intervention and cost effectiveness of EVAR have been demonstrated to be dominated by open surgery. That is that people with intact AAA should be offered open surgery if medically suitable. The choice of technique for emergency AAA repair is less contentious, with the more traditional approach of open repair being rapidly overtaken by endovascular options in those who are anatomically suitable for EVAR. Technical analysis by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has consistently reported favourable outcomes with EVAR in the emergency setting and that it is a cost-effective treatment. In this article we provide an overview of the evidence supporting the different treatment options, outline current approaches to risk stratification, describe the key physiological changes that occur during open repair and describe an overview of the approach to perioperative management.
期刊介绍:
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, an invaluable source of up-to-date information, with the curriculum of both the Primary and Final FRCA examinations covered over a three-year cycle. Published monthly this ever-updating text book will be an invaluable source for both trainee and experienced anaesthetists. The enthusiastic editorial board, under the guidance of two eminent and experienced series editors, ensures Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine covers all the key topics in a comprehensive and authoritative manner. Articles now include learning objectives and eash issue features MCQs, facilitating self-directed learning and enabling readers at all levels to test their knowledge. Each issue is divided between basic scientific and clinical sections. The basic science articles include anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics and clinical measurement, while the clinical sections cover anaesthetic agents and techniques, assessment and perioperative management. Further sections cover audit, trials, statistics, ethical and legal medicine, and the management of acute and chronic pain.