Anaesthesia for open abdominal aortic surgery

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Alastair Duncan, Adam Conrad Pichel
{"title":"Anaesthesia for open abdominal aortic surgery","authors":"Alastair Duncan,&nbsp;Adam Conrad Pichel","doi":"10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has declined in recent years and according to the annual National Vascular Registry reports (2019–23) the number of patients undergoing aneurysm repair has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 years. The UK has worked tirelessly to reduce its operative mortality rates for elective open AAA repair with the introduction of a quality improvement pro-gramme. Reducing death from ruptured aortic aneurysm has been the focus of the national screening programme. The short-term benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) when compared to open repair are well described, however, the long-term survival benefits, freedom form re-intervention and cost effectiveness of EVAR have been demonstrated to be dominated by open surgery. That is that people with intact AAA should be offered open surgery if medically suitable. The choice of technique for emergency AAA repair is less contentious, with the more traditional approach of open repair being rapidly overtaken by endovascular options in those who are anatomically suitable for EVAR. Technical analysis by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has consistently reported favourable outcomes with EVAR in the emergency setting and that it is a cost-effective treatment. In this article we provide an overview of the evidence supporting the different treatment options, outline current approaches to risk stratification, describe the key physiological changes that occur during open repair and describe an overview of the approach to perioperative management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45856,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 95-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472029924002480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has declined in recent years and according to the annual National Vascular Registry reports (2019–23) the number of patients undergoing aneurysm repair has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 years. The UK has worked tirelessly to reduce its operative mortality rates for elective open AAA repair with the introduction of a quality improvement pro-gramme. Reducing death from ruptured aortic aneurysm has been the focus of the national screening programme. The short-term benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) when compared to open repair are well described, however, the long-term survival benefits, freedom form re-intervention and cost effectiveness of EVAR have been demonstrated to be dominated by open surgery. That is that people with intact AAA should be offered open surgery if medically suitable. The choice of technique for emergency AAA repair is less contentious, with the more traditional approach of open repair being rapidly overtaken by endovascular options in those who are anatomically suitable for EVAR. Technical analysis by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has consistently reported favourable outcomes with EVAR in the emergency setting and that it is a cost-effective treatment. In this article we provide an overview of the evidence supporting the different treatment options, outline current approaches to risk stratification, describe the key physiological changes that occur during open repair and describe an overview of the approach to perioperative management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, an invaluable source of up-to-date information, with the curriculum of both the Primary and Final FRCA examinations covered over a three-year cycle. Published monthly this ever-updating text book will be an invaluable source for both trainee and experienced anaesthetists. The enthusiastic editorial board, under the guidance of two eminent and experienced series editors, ensures Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine covers all the key topics in a comprehensive and authoritative manner. Articles now include learning objectives and eash issue features MCQs, facilitating self-directed learning and enabling readers at all levels to test their knowledge. Each issue is divided between basic scientific and clinical sections. The basic science articles include anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics and clinical measurement, while the clinical sections cover anaesthetic agents and techniques, assessment and perioperative management. Further sections cover audit, trials, statistics, ethical and legal medicine, and the management of acute and chronic pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信