Effects of emotional design and age on learning performance of self-care instructions for diabetes: Evidence from eye-tracking and heart rate variability

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Kaifeng Liu , Jie Li , Pengbo Su , Da Tao
{"title":"Effects of emotional design and age on learning performance of self-care instructions for diabetes: Evidence from eye-tracking and heart rate variability","authors":"Kaifeng Liu ,&nbsp;Jie Li ,&nbsp;Pengbo Su ,&nbsp;Da Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to examine the effects of emotional design and age on individuals’ learning performance of diabetes self-care instruction.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A two-factor (3 × 2) between-subjects design was employed, with emotional design and age as independent variables. Participants (30 young adults and 30 middle-aged and older adults) were required to learn with a series of text-illustration combined instructions in various design formats (i.e., neutral, black-and-white anthropomorphic, and colored anthropomorphic designs). Participants’ learning time, comprehension test score, eye-movement measures, heart rate variability (HRV) measures, and subjective perceptions were measured and analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The three design formats achieved comparable task performance; however, the black-and-white anthropomorphic design resulted in a longer first visit duration. Middle-aged and older adults took longer time to learn the instructions and yielded lower comprehension test score. They also yielded longer total fixation duration, smaller pupil size, larger first visit duration, fewer visits, lower SD2/SD1, and higher perceived cognitive load than younger adults. Eye movement behaviors were also found to differ between the illustration and text portions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Emotional design in instruction design did not facilitate nor hamper learning. Further studies need to determine the optimal level of emotional design. Middle-aged and older adults may experience difficulties when learning self-care instructions. Moreover, it is feasible to implement eye-tracking and HRV techniques when evaluating interface design. Human factors experiment need to be conducted to examine how emotional design manipulations affect individuals’ comprehension to ensure the learning materials can be truly effective when applied in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50570,"journal":{"name":"Displays","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 102947"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Displays","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938224003111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study aimed to examine the effects of emotional design and age on individuals’ learning performance of diabetes self-care instruction.

Materials and Methods

A two-factor (3 × 2) between-subjects design was employed, with emotional design and age as independent variables. Participants (30 young adults and 30 middle-aged and older adults) were required to learn with a series of text-illustration combined instructions in various design formats (i.e., neutral, black-and-white anthropomorphic, and colored anthropomorphic designs). Participants’ learning time, comprehension test score, eye-movement measures, heart rate variability (HRV) measures, and subjective perceptions were measured and analyzed.

Results

The three design formats achieved comparable task performance; however, the black-and-white anthropomorphic design resulted in a longer first visit duration. Middle-aged and older adults took longer time to learn the instructions and yielded lower comprehension test score. They also yielded longer total fixation duration, smaller pupil size, larger first visit duration, fewer visits, lower SD2/SD1, and higher perceived cognitive load than younger adults. Eye movement behaviors were also found to differ between the illustration and text portions.

Conclusions

Emotional design in instruction design did not facilitate nor hamper learning. Further studies need to determine the optimal level of emotional design. Middle-aged and older adults may experience difficulties when learning self-care instructions. Moreover, it is feasible to implement eye-tracking and HRV techniques when evaluating interface design. Human factors experiment need to be conducted to examine how emotional design manipulations affect individuals’ comprehension to ensure the learning materials can be truly effective when applied in practice.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Displays
Displays 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
25.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Displays is the international journal covering the research and development of display technology, its effective presentation and perception of information, and applications and systems including display-human interface. Technical papers on practical developments in Displays technology provide an effective channel to promote greater understanding and cross-fertilization across the diverse disciplines of the Displays community. Original research papers solving ergonomics issues at the display-human interface advance effective presentation of information. Tutorial papers covering fundamentals intended for display technologies and human factor engineers new to the field will also occasionally featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信